[Alac-sc-outreach] Ideas for Engagement Strategies
berandondeh at yahoo.com
Thu Sep 17 07:09:08 UTC 2015
Can you please re attach document I did not receive an attachment and Would like to see how your analysis was done.
Thanks and Regards
"There is nothing more difficult to arrange and more dangerous to carry through than initiating change..." Machiavelli
Sent from my iPhone
> On 13 Sep 2015, at 16:45, Glenn McKnight <mcknight.glenn at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi All
> I have attached the NARALO attendance spreadsheet to the WIKI which is the basis of my comment about the 51% of ALS's being AWOL during the first six months.
> We need to know what is the ALS participation rate of all the RALO's
> Glenn McKnight
> mcknight.glenn at gmail.com
> skype gmcknight
> twitter gmcknight
>> On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 10:38 AM, Vanda Scartezini <vanda at scartezini.org> wrote:
>> See some points in blue below
>> Vanda Scartezini
>> Polo Consultores Associados
>> Av. Paulista 1159, cj 1004
>> 01311-200- Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
>> Land Line: +55 11 3266.6253
>> Mobile: + 55 11 98181.1464
>> Sorry for any typos.
>> From: <alac-sc-outreach-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org> on behalf of Remmy Nweke
>> Date: Saturday, September 12, 2015 at 17:20
>> To: Dev Teelucksingh
>> Cc: ALAC Subcommittee Outreach
>> Subject: Re: [Alac-sc-outreach] Ideas for Engagement Strategies
>> Hi Dev and all.
>> Please find below my response to your initial questions as follows for further discussion:
>> Best of the day.
>> Remmy Nweke
>> 1* What would be the criterion for deciding if an ALS is not engaged in your RALO/At-Large?
>> I think there was some criterion set at the inception. A look at it would help in determining if they are meeting the demands in their ALS expectations.
>> VS – participating on emails lists, participating on inside groups ( I believe that representing ALAC in external groups has similar value) and attend at least 80% of LACRALO conference calls ( apologizing if not able)
>> 2* Do RALOs have a list of non-engaged ALSes?
>> There should be a subtle research in this respect based on the expectations outlined in the application as what they engage in vis a vis current demands of ALS.
>> Act participation could be one of the criteria.
>> VS - After the aproval of formal criteria lista Ralo shall control, ( Secretary task to do so) and publish it
>> 3* What are possible approaches to deal with non-engaged ALSes?
>> Nos 1 and 2 above must be taken into consideration to determine the No. 3.
>> VS – first call for attention of such ALS in a private email about it situation in the published list when it reach 50% of no attendance in one year time – not necessary calendar year). Reaching the 80%, for instance, inform that ALS will enter into the exclusion period ( 1 month) during this period ALS shall send clear and proved excuses to not being participating ( for instance was living in another country and now is coming back… ) if nothing happen. The ALS will be excluded.
>> 4- Decide to pick some ALSes to focus and mentor with? What criteria do we use to pick which ones and why?
>> The aforesaid research on ALS non-engagement will help in fashioning if some need mentoring and in what areas, then viable members could be asked to pick those for mentoring based on know-how and regional where necessary.
>> VS- country shall be the first criteria, allowing personal contact if needed. Time as Als to really offer adequate couching. Time to dedicate to the ALS. But the request shall come from the non engaged ALS.
>> 5- Do we survey those non-engaged ALSes to find out why they are not engaged? (A challenge is that they may not respond to a survey)
>> This question is similar to offshoot of No. 2 above. But directly YES and find out their challenges. You should not be concerned if they did not respond, our concern is to do the needful which in this case is find out via survey, period and then move on from there.
>> VS – could be interesting aftert reach 50% on not participating as in my response nº3
>> 6* How can ALSes, especially newer ALSes be more engaged when they join At-Larg
>> We may ask them to join a sub-committee after acceptance and then plan an induction at the nearest ICANN to integrate them into the fold, especially those they could work with and receive mentorship.
>> This could begin with a webinar/documentary on what is ALAC and ALS, modalities of engagement.
>> VS – I believe we shall have a engagement for new committees where this committee shall be composed of all oldest engaged ALS ( to administrate lack of time), and can answer questions, suggest participation etc
>> 7- Perhaps by having the sort of material, not necessarily a beginner's guide, but some form of infographcs and short videos are needed.
>> A good idea needs no further colouration.
>> VS – will help too
>> 8. Maybe we need to look at ICANN Learn, or Glenn's ebook project to see how to convey these concepts on how ALSes can be involved. The At-Large website redesign is also looking at these concepts of how we reach persons to get involved.
>> The concept eventually adopted must be web-based and accessible online at all times. VS – Agree with this idea
>> REMMY NWEKE, Lead Strategist/Group Executive Editor,
>> DigitalSENSE Africa Media Ltd [Multiple-award winning medium]
>> (DigitalSENSE Business News; ITREALMS, NaijaAgroNet)
>> Block F1, Shop 133 Moyosore Aboderin Plaza, Bolade Junction, Oshodi-Lagos
>> M: 234-8033592762, 8023122558, 8051000475, T: @ITRealms
>> Author: A Decade of ICT Reportage in Nigeria
>> NDSF 2016
>> *Confidentiality Notice:* The information in this document and attachments are confidential and may also be privileged information. It is intended only for the use of the named recipient. Remmy Nweke does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this e-mail. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify me immediately, then delete this document and do not disclose the contents of this document to any other person, nor make any copies. Violators may face court persecution.
>>> On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 1:39 PM, Dev Anand Teelucksingh <devtee at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Dear All,
>>> With the discussion of the outreach strategies on the September 8 2015 call (https://community.icann.org/x/iYRYAw), we didn't have a chance to discuss on first steps for
>>> strategies for At-Large engagement.
>>> Its an important topic as I'm sure all RALOs have many ALSes that and I therefore want to begin discussions before our next conference call.
>>> I've created a wiki space at
>>> for us to comment on and get some ideas.
>>> Some first thoughts to get the discussions about engagement going:
>>> Some first ideas to generate discussion:
>>> * What would be the criterion for deciding if an ALS is not engaged in your RALO/At-Large?
>>> * Do RALOs have a list of non-engaged ALSes?
>>> * What are possible approaches to deal with non-engaged ALSes?
>>> - Decide to pick some ALSes to focus and mentor with? What criteria do we use to pick which ones and why?
>>> - Do we survey those non-engaged ALSes to find out why they are not engaged? (A challenge is that they may not respond to a survey)
>>> * How can ALSes, especially newer ALSes be more engaged when they join At-Large?
>>> - Perhaps by having the sort of material, not necessarily a beginner's guide, but some form of infographcs and short videos are needed. Maybe we need to look at ICANN Learn, or Glenn's ebook project to see how to convey these concepts on how ALSes can be involved. The At-Large website redesign is also looking at these concepts of how we reach persons to get involved.
>>> Have at it!
>>> Kind Regards,
>>> Dev Anand Teelucksingh
>>> Alac-sc-outreach mailing list
>>> Alac-sc-outreach at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>> Alac-sc-outreach mailing list
>> Alac-sc-outreach at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> Alac-sc-outreach mailing list
> Alac-sc-outreach at atlarge-lists.icann.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Alac-sc-outreach