[Alac-sc-outreach] [ALAC] Fwd: [ICANN60_Onboarding] Call for ICANN61 Nominations

Tijani BEN JEMAA tijani.benjemaa at topnet.tn
Fri Nov 24 14:29:07 UTC 2017


Dear Eduardo,

I love your many cents….. lol.

I have a problem with the overall conception of the COP since I don’t feel we don’t all have the same understanding:
To be efficient, how long should the program last for each mentee????
Shall it be continuous for each mentee????
Do we have the ability to take the travel support of the mentor and give it to another mentee????
Is it important to have more mentees with shorter mentoring period and less F2F meeting attended????

To set the scene for our discussion next Tuesday, we need these question answered and agreed on by all our members. 

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tijani BEN JEMAA
Executive Director
Mediterranean Federation of Internet Associations (FMAI)
Phone: +216 98 330 114
            +216 52 385 114
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------


>> Le 24 nov. 2017 à 14:17, Eduardo Diaz <eduardodiazrivera at gmail.com <mailto:eduardodiazrivera at gmail.com>> a écrit :
>> 
>> Seun et al: 
>> 
>> I propose the following:
>> 
>> ​For travel slots: 
>> 
>> 1. The program mentor should be selected from within ​the ​funded ALAC members and RALO officers​ pool​. If we do this there will be one additional travel spot for each meeting since these two sets are currently funded.​ This will cover the second travel slot for each meeting.
>> 
>> For Mentors/Mentees: 
>> Ratio: One Mentor to 6 Mentees
>> One Mentor selected for a 3 meeting period.  Selection to occur after the AGM for each cycle. No term limited.
>> ​​Two Mentees selected for a 3 meeting period. Selection to occur after the Annual General Meeting (AGM). Term Limited. 
>> ​Six ​distinctive ​Mentees​ ​to be selected using a round-robin scheme with regional balance as follows:
>> ​One Mentee to be from the region where the meeting is held​
>> The second to be selected using the following algorithm:
>> ​With five regions: A,B,C,D & E where the meeting is held on a rotational scheme, the second Mentee may be selected as follows:  
>> ​Mentee #1 | Mentee #2
>> A | D
>> B | E
>> C | A
>> D | B
>> E | C
>> 
>> ​​For nominations to the program:
>> 
>> ​Before each AGM, each RALO nominates their Mentor/Mentee​s and sends recommendation to ALAC and the ALAC Appointee Selection Committee <https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/ALAC+Subcommittee+on+Appointee+Selection>  (AASC) for Mentees' final approval. This to happen before the end of the AGM.
>> ALAC nominates their Mentor and sends to AASC for Mentor's final selection from the RALOs and ALAC pool of nominations. This to happen after the AGM.
>> AASC selects final slate and sends it to the Community Onboarding Pilot Program (COPP) Program manager for final approval. 
>> 
>> My many cents.
>> 
>> -ed
>>>> 
>> On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 12:23 AM Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com <mailto:seun.ojedeji at gmail.com>> wrote:
>> Hello Eduardo,
>> 
>> I guess that is exactly what this thread is intended to achieve. Olivier is taking us through the process of finalising on this and am sure those information required by your RALO will be made available. 
>> It may be good to know though if you (or your RALO) supports the process proposed by Olivier.
>> 
>> As  your question about how staff selects final slate, u stand to be corrected but I think it's each community that finalizes their slate and sends to staff; staff will not do the selection and I also don't think they will reject candidates recommended by the respective community. 
>> 
>> Regards
>> 
>> Sent from my mobile
>> Kindly excuse brevity and typos
>> 
>> On Nov 24, 2017 12:57 AM, "Eduardo Diaz" <eduardodiazrivera at gmail.com <mailto:eduardodiazrivera at gmail.com>> wrote:
>> NARALO needs to know the process as to how people get nominated to this program and once they are nominated, who and how in ALAC  selects its nominees and then who and how in the Onboarding Staff selects the final slate of mentors/mentees.
>> 
>> -ed
>> 
>> On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 10:45 PM, Tijani BEN JEMAA <tijani.benjemaa at fmai.org.tn <mailto:tijani.benjemaa at fmai.org.tn>> wrote:
>> Thank you Olivier.
>> 
>> I think this issue should be on the agenda of the upcoming ALAC meeting (Tuesday 28 November).
>> I hope that all ALAC members will come to the call with their remarks on Olivier’s proposal and any other proposal they may have so that it will be a venue of reflection, but selection of the best proposal.
>> 
>> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Tijani BEN JEMAA
>> Executive Director
>> Mediterranean Federation of Internet Associations (FMAI)
>> Phone: +216 98 330 114 <tel:+216%2098%20330%20114>
>>             +216 52 385 114 <tel:+216%2052%20385%20114>
>> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> 
>> 
>>> Le 23 nov. 2017 à 16:10, Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond <ocl at gih.com <mailto:ocl at gih.com>> a écrit :
>>> 
>>> Hello all,
>>> 
>>> on the process to select mentors/mentees.
>>> 
>>> On 22/11/2017 00:01, Seun Ojedeji wrote:
>>>> ALAC Selection Committee?
>>>> 
>>>> SO: I think this group are used to reviewing and selecting such non-RALO centric positions and may be in a better place to perform this task. 
>>>> 
>>>> Overall my suggestion is to push this to the ASC.
>>> 
>>> Recognising it was an excellent idea I shared this with the ALT yesterday and this idea has received support.
>>> 
>>> Today I had a call with Beran Dondeh Gillen, one of this past year's Mentees. She, along with Isaac Maposa, were mentored by Dev Anand Teelucksingh and put together a proposal for a follow-up to the mentoring program. This proposal was that in the next cycle, five people from At-Large should be mentored, one from each RALO. 
>>> 
>>> With the news that only 1 mentee & 1 mentor would be funded, specifically in the lead up to the next ICANN meeting, with 1 other mentee that  would need to be funded by other means, the concept of having 5 mentees sounded as though not possible. Heidi asked Ergys Ramaj about having 5 mentees funded, one for each region. That was categorically refused as there isn't the funding to do this, this year.
>>> 
>>> So Beran suggested a version of the proposed plan: 
>>> 
>>> - 5 mentees, to be proposed by each RALO, but actually selected, one per region, by the ALAC Selection Committee.
>>> - 1 mentor selected from a slate of applicants, by the ALAC Selection Committee
>>> 
>>> The mentor starts mentoring all 5 mentees through a set of calls throughout the year, with the 5 mentees. The mentor travels to each of the ICANN meetings in the year.
>>> With 3 ICANN meetings in a year, 2 mentees go to March meeting. 2 mentees go to June meeting. 1 mentee goes to AGM in November. Thus, all 5 mentees have had a chance to attend one funded ICANN meeting. This means there is actually a shortfall of only 2 travel slots, one at the March meeting and one at the June meeting. As the focus for mentoring is about policy, one slot for each of these two meetings could be a discretionary slot current available for a policy person to take part in the meeting.
>>> 
>>> This is just a simple proposal - Feedback/Comments welcome as soon as possible! We need to have finalised a process by the end of this week.
>>> 
>>> Kindest regards,
>>> 
>>> Olivier 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> ALAC mailing list
>>> ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
>>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac <https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac>
>>> 
>>> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org <http://www.atlarge.icann.org/>
>>> ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC) <https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)>
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> ALAC mailing list
>> ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac <https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac>
>> 
>> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org <http://www.atlarge.icann.org/>
>> ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC) <https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)>
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> NOTICE: This email may contain information which is confidential and/or subject to legal privilege, and is intended for the use of the named addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not use, disclose or copy any part of this email. If you have received this email by mistake, please notify the sender and delete this message immediately.
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> ALAC mailing list
>> ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac <https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac>
>> 
>> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org <http://www.atlarge.icann.org/>
>> ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC) <https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)>
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/alac-sc-outreach/attachments/20171124/1fdc6af2/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Alac-sc-outreach mailing list