[Alac-sc-outreach] "O&E strategy 2019 v2" and "O&E suggestions"
mcknight.glenn at gmail.com
Sat Feb 2 21:09:21 UTC 2019
Sign up sheet
mcknight.glenn at gmail.com
IEEE Toronto SIGHT Chair
glenn.mcknight at ieee.org
On Sat, Feb 2, 2019 at 1:52 PM Maureen Hilyard <maureen.hilyard at gmail.com>
> Hi everyone
> There are some excellent ideas coming out of this committee and I
> certainly don't want you to lose sight of them.
> However, from this subcommittee I need an O&E strategy and a Capacity
> Building strategy so that they can be endorsed by the ALAC ideally before
> we get to Kobe. While both may have communication and metrics components,
> the strategies are to give the working groups some direction for the
> future. Mention of communication and metrics need only be with regards to
> assisting the direction of the strategy which should be high level and not
> require and specific details.
> Detailed communication and metrics guidelines will be produced once we get
> other priorities out of the way- and they are already included in our
> Review Implementation Plan. I also believe that we are going to have
> someone from Comms attending the next ARIWG meeting - you are all welcome
> to attend.
> The guidelines will be provided to help working groups to develop their
> own metrics based on what projects they are currently undertaking and what
> outcomes they want to result from those activities - with indicators to
> demonstrate that the outcome has been achieved. This will provide
> meaningful information for your report to outsiders about what has taken
> place and how you know that you achieved what you set out to do.
> The ATLASIII Leadership team is currently doing just that in identifying
> the criteria to be used to choose our ATLAS travellers with indicators that
> must demonstrate that they meet the criteria. I cannot see the point in a
> metrics group actually creating metrics for a strategy or project that they
> don't own. Their role will be to set the guidelines and to provide advice
> if asked to ensure that the measures used are appropriate.
> So if the O&E group can work and agree on the two strategies we need
> before Kobe for endorsement by the ALAC, then we can move on to deciding
> what the two groups will do and what communication approaches and measures
> will be needed to demonstrate that their project objectives have been
> Thank you so much for your commitment and your passion - two important
> leadership characteristics :)
> On Sat, Feb 2, 2019 at 6:52 AM DANIEL NANGHAKA <dndannang at gmail.com>
>> Dear Natalia,
>> Thanks for your email and reaching out.
>> I agree with your suggestion as the later document mainly focuses on
>> communication strategy.
>> As part of the O&E strategy 2019 v2, it also intends to detail how we
>> conduct communication and engagement which will strongly rely on the
>> communication from the comms team.
>> The activities are great and they come through collaboration with the GSE
>> and respective stakeholders which include and not limited to the Outreach
>> and Engagement Co-chairs. Furthermore the Activity Matrix is something that
>> we can develop but also feed into the calender of key events of engagement
>> and this is based on the Individuals who are selected to attend or
>> represent At-Large through CROP of Discretionary funds.
>> I would like to take this upon as an Action Point upon dialogue through
>> this mailing list.
>> We shall come to the breakdown through respective Capacity building
>> engagement which will target both Individuals and ALSes. The key emphasis
>> is how do we enhance or build engagement in the Policy Development Process.
>> That is the direction that we are going. We are not there yet but we shall
>> get there.
>> On Sat, 2 Feb 2019 at 17:02, Natalia Filina <filinafilka at gmail.com>
>>> Dear Daniel and colleagues, hi!
>>> Let me make some suggestions regarding our working process:
>>> Now we have two documents for the discussion - "O&E strategy 2019 v2"
>>> and "O&E suggestions". Maybe it would be more expedient if:
>>> 1. To Merge these two documents.
>>> 2. To create (after or during approval-time of the final version) a
>>> matrix of activities indicating all of our actions and quality of
>>> participation, with deadlines, responsible persons, to provide links to
>>> ICANN structures with which we will cooperate on each item?
>>> I think it may help us to organize and structure our work.
>>> And second one:
>>> Maybe within the strategy we need to make a division on OE activity
>>> towards individuals and ALSs, because in general these two types of
>>> audiences suppose different tools usage.
>>> What do you think about it?
>>> Sincerely yours,
>>> Natalia Filina
>>> Member of ISOC
>>> Member of EURALO Individuals’ Association
>>> ALAC Subcommittee on Outreach and Engagement
>>> +7 906 722 54 61
>>> Russian Federation
>> Nanghaka Daniel K.
>> Executive Director - ILICIT Africa/ Chair - Outreach and Engagement WG
>> (ICANN At-Large)/ former Chair - FOSSFA / Geo4Africa Lead / Organising
>> Team - FOSS4G2018
>> Mobile +256 772 898298 (Uganda)
>> Skype: daniel.nanghaka
>> ----------------------------------------- *"Working for Africa" *
>> Alac-sc-outreach mailing list
>> Alac-sc-outreach at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> Alac-sc-outreach mailing list
> Alac-sc-outreach at atlarge-lists.icann.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Alac-sc-outreach