<div dir="ltr">Dear Dev<div><br></div><div>I am not a policy/law person. Hence I cannot tell the difference. Maybe some one from respective stakeholder group can guide us better.</div><div><br></div><div>I am not sure if they are 100% accurate, I just want them there. Just like you mapped them, do so in presentation. Its upto you how many stakeholders you want to include, according to the NextGenners here:</div><div><br></div><div><a href="https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2016-08-19-en">https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2016-08-19-en</a><br></div><div><br></div><div>In my time the stakeholder group was mentioned along with each NextGenner. Maybe you will have to ask Deborah Escalera/Janice Lange in this regard. With your experience and deep knowledge of ICANN, you can map it a lot better than I could.</div><div><br></div><div>Regards</div><div><br></div><div>Adeel</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 12:44 AM, Dev Anand Teelucksingh <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:devtee@gmail.com" target="_blank">devtee@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Thanks Adeel for this.<br>
<br>
So for reference the WGs can be found at <a href="https://atlarge.icann.org/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://atlarge.icann.org/</a><br>
and the <a href="https://atlarge.icann.org/get-involved" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://atlarge.icann.org/get-<wbr>involved</a> page has the ability to<br>
sort WGs by Policy, Process and Outreach and Engagement<br>
<br>
You mentioned the following categories of persons in Nextgen :<br>
technical, law, policy and civil society<br>
<br>
What's the difference between law and policy persons?<br>
<br>
Some possible mappings:<br>
<br>
Technical mapping to<br>
Technical Issues <a href="https://atlarge.icann.org/working_groups/technical-issues" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://atlarge.icann.org/<wbr>working_groups/technical-<wbr>issues</a><br>
Accessibilty <a href="https://atlarge.icann.org/working_groups/accessibility" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://atlarge.icann.org/<wbr>working_groups/accessibility</a><br>
Technology <a href="https://atlarge.icann.org/working_groups/technology" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://atlarge.icann.org/<wbr>working_groups/technology</a><br>
<br>
Policy (and Law) mapping to<br>
ICANN Evolution <a href="https://atlarge.icann.org/working_groups/icann-evolution" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://atlarge.icann.org/<wbr>working_groups/icann-evolution</a><br>
IDN Policy <a href="https://atlarge.icann.org/working_groups/idn-policy" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://atlarge.icann.org/<wbr>working_groups/idn-policy</a><br>
New gTLDs <a href="https://atlarge.icann.org/working_groups/new-gtlds" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://atlarge.icann.org/<wbr>working_groups/new-gtlds</a><br>
Registration Issues <a href="https://atlarge.icann.org/working_groups/registration-issues" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://atlarge.icann.org/<wbr>working_groups/registration-<wbr>issues</a><br>
Public Interest <a href="https://atlarge.icann.org/working_groups/registration-issues" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://atlarge.icann.org/<wbr>working_groups/registration-<wbr>issues</a><br>
<br>
Civil Society mapping to<br>
Capacity Building <a href="https://atlarge.icann.org/working_groups/capacity-building" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://atlarge.icann.org/<wbr>working_groups/capacity-<wbr>building</a><br>
Outreach and Engagement :<br>
<a href="https://atlarge.icann.org/working_groups/outreach-engagement" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://atlarge.icann.org/<wbr>working_groups/outreach-<wbr>engagement</a><br>
Social Media <a href="https://atlarge.icann.org/working_groups/outreach-engagement" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://atlarge.icann.org/<wbr>working_groups/outreach-<wbr>engagement</a><br>
<br>
and not showing the process WGs (in which there are many)<br>
<br>
But are these mappings accurate ?<br>
Wouldn't we want all persons that care about end user issues be<br>
involved in one or more policy WGs?<br>
<br>
<br>
Kind Regards,<br>
<br>
Dev Anand<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Can someone attempt to put on the Google Presentations such a table<br>
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 4:33 PM, Adeel Sadiq <<a href="mailto:11beeasadiq@seecs.edu.pk">11beeasadiq@seecs.edu.pk</a>> wrote:<br>
> Dear Dev<br>
><br>
> Greetings from Pakistan. Just a quick comment. Being a part of NextGen<br>
> myself, I feel the portion of How to Engage needs a little more work,<br>
> because in the end that's what we all want from NextGen right?<br>
><br>
> To give you an example, thankfully you'll find people from technical, law,<br>
> policy, civil society background in NextGen. So I think, we need to include<br>
> one more slide that has 2 columns, 1 for the name of the stakeholder group<br>
> and next to it the WGs that fall into that category, not all but maybe some.<br>
> It will be a lot convenient. I can see the link to WGs on slide, but trust<br>
> me when I say this, a lot of youth today wont bother going to the website<br>
> and then surf and search and read mission statements and purpose of WGs to<br>
> find a suitable place (unless you are an ICANN addict like myself), compared<br>
> to when they already know which WGs fall under their stakeholder affiliation<br>
> which they can quickly jot down without having to download the whole<br>
> presentation. The sole purpose of 'Engagement' won't be as effective as we<br>
> would want it to be.<br>
><br>
> I hope you get my point and will consider it in your final version.<br>
><br>
> Thanking in anticipation.<br>
><br>
> Adeel Sadiq<br>
> Pakistan<br>
><br>
> On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 1:09 AM, Dev Anand Teelucksingh <<a href="mailto:devtee@gmail.com">devtee@gmail.com</a>><br>
> wrote:<br>
>><br>
>> Dear All,<br>
>><br>
>> A preliminary draft of the At-Large presentation for the At-Large<br>
>> meeting with the Nextgen students at ICANN57 can be found at<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> <a href="https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1zFhDZ3m3mFyubb1crnVdqwmfBXU7_Vrdx-PiU1zEEW4/edit?usp=sharing" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://docs.google.com/<wbr>presentation/d/<wbr>1zFhDZ3m3mFyubb1crnVdqwmfBXU7_<wbr>Vrdx-PiU1zEEW4/edit?usp=<wbr>sharing</a><br>
>><br>
>> Its based on the presentation done for the At-Large-Nextgen meeting at<br>
>> ICANN56<br>
>> I've put some comments for possible improvements but wanted to share<br>
>> now to get additional suggestions from you all.<br>
>><br>
>> Dev Anand<br>
>> ______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
>> Alac-sc-outreach mailing list<br>
>> <a href="mailto:Alac-sc-outreach@atlarge-lists.icann.org">Alac-sc-outreach@atlarge-<wbr>lists.icann.org</a><br>
>> <a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-sc-outreach" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/<wbr>listinfo/alac-sc-outreach</a><br>
><br>
><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>