[At-review] Revised staff questions from Becky and Brian

[Janis Karklins]

My apologies for confusion with written answers. I will correct my mistake when will forward the list of question to Rod I about an hour. I will add to Peter’s last version of the list also the question which was submitted by Mr. Zhang.

 

Best regards

JK

 

From: at-review-bounces at icann.org [mailto:at-review-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Burr, Becky
Sent: otrdiena, 2010. gada 27. aprīlī 15:02
To: Lstrickling at ntia.doc.gov; janis.karklins at icann.org; at-review at icann.org
Subject: Re: [At-review] Revised staff questions from Becky and Brian

 

I did not think we were asking for written answers - just docs where relevant -i.e. Policies, etc. No point in written answers in my view. 

 

  _____  

From: at-review-bounces at icann.org <at-review-bounces at icann.org> 
To: Janis Karklins <janis.karklins at icann.org>; at-review at icann.org <at-review at icann.org> 
Sent: Tue Apr 27 08:29:55 2010
Subject: Re: [At-review] Revised staff questions from Becky and Brian 

I had not envisioned that we would require written responses to all of our questions.  Perhaps we can talk about the need for that next week.  I do hope that staff will be able to present information responsive to all of these questions next week, regardless whether a written followup is expected or required.  Finally, I am more than a little concerned that Rod will not be present himself and question what could be more important in Washington than his being in Marina del Rey to work with us.  It sends a very bad message to the rest of his staff if he does not take this exercise seriously enough to change his schedule to meet with us.

 

From: at-review-bounces at icann.org [mailto:at-review-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Janis Karklins
Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 1:25 AM
To: at-review at icann.org
Cc: 'Marco Lorenzoni'; 'Alice Jansen'
Subject: Re: [At-review] Revised staff questions from Becky and Brian

 

Thank you Becky and Brian for your input.

I intend to pass these question to Rod at the beginning of the working day in LA. I hope that the RT agrees with them.

 

On the other subject, I informed Rod about the substance of our discussion yesterday. He responded along the lines:

·         Staff looks forward to engage with RT. 

·         The senior staff will be assigned to brief the RT according to our whishes. 

·         Rod himself has obligations in DC that week but will join the meeting by telephone for 2 hours or so.

·         Audio streaming of the RT meeting will be provided

·         The written answers to the questions may take 4-6 weeks, as staff is heavily involved in preparations for the Brussels meeting and finalizing the new gTLD DAG4. But staff will do utmost to provide answers in the shortest time possible.

 

Best regards

JK

 

From: at-review-bounces at icann.org [mailto:at-review-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Burr, Becky
Sent: otrdiena, 2010. gada 27. aprīlī 0:14
To: at-review at icann.org
Subject: [At-review] Revised staff questions from Becky and Brian

 

Here is the document that Brian and I revised to group it into the three categories discussed and to trim it a bit.

 

B

 

 

J. Beckwith Burr | WilmerHale

1875 Pennsylvania Avenue NW

Washington, DC 20006 USA

+1 202 663 6695 (t)

+1 202 663 6363 (f)

becky.burr at wilmerhale.com


Please consider the environment before printing this email.

  _____  

This email message and any attachments are being sent by Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, are confidential, and may be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify us immediately—by replying to this message or by sending an email to  <mailto:postmaster at wilmerhale.com> postmaster at wilmerhale.com—and destroy all copies of this message and any attachments. Thank you. 

 

For more information about WilmerHale, please visit us at  <http://www.wilmerhale.com/> http://www.wilmerhale.com.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/at-review/attachments/20100427/8302833b/attachment.html