[At-review] Revised staff questions from Becky and Brian

Cheryl Langdon-Orr langdonorr at gmail.com
Tue Apr 27 22:05:51 UTC 2010


I'm in absolute agreement with the views raised by Larry and supported by
Warren and I must say also hope the CEO will be able to be present, it will
give a very odd message to our communities (well certainly mine)  if he is
not.


Cheryl Langdon-Orr
(CLO)



On 28 April 2010 07:27, <wadelman at godaddy.com> wrote:

> I have to second Larry's comments below, both on the expectation of verbal
> response (documentation where it currently exits), and on the availability,
> or lack thereof, of the CEO of ICANN. This is the first face-to-face meeting
> of the first AoC Review Team. We should insist that ICANN and its CEO give
> it the import that it deserves and that was set forth in the AoC document.
> As Larry notes, the attendance of the CEO of ICANN will demonstrate the
> organization's commitment to this process.
>
> Warren
>
> Warren Adelman
> President & COO
> GoDaddy.com
> warren at godaddy.com
> tel. (480)505-8835
> fax. (480)275-3990
> mobile.(480)882-8876
> twitter: http://twitter.com/asocialcontract
> http://www.godaddy.com
>
>
>  -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: [At-review] Revised staff questions from Becky and Brian
> From: Larry Strickling <Lstrickling at ntia.doc.gov>
> Date: Tue, April 27, 2010 5:29 am
> To: Janis Karklins <janis.karklins at icann.org>,
> "at-review at icann.org" <at-review at icann.org>
>
>  I had not envisioned that we would require written responses to all of
> our questions.  Perhaps we can talk about the need for that next week.  I do
> hope that staff will be able to present information responsive to *all *of
> these questions next week, regardless whether a written followup is expected
> or required.  Finally, I am more than a little concerned that Rod will not
> be present himself and question what could be more important in Washington
> than his being in Marina del Rey to work with us.  It sends a very bad
> message to the rest of his staff if he does not take this exercise seriously
> enough to change his schedule to meet with us.
>
>  *From:* at-review-bounces at icann.org [mailto:at-review-bounces at icann.org<at-review-bounces at icann.org>]
> *On Behalf Of *Janis Karklins
> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 27, 2010 1:25 AM
> *To:* at-review at icann.org
> *Cc:* 'Marco Lorenzoni'; 'Alice Jansen'
> *Subject:* Re: [At-review] Revised staff questions from Becky and Brian
>
> Thank you Becky and Brian for your input.
> I intend to pass these question to Rod at the beginning of the working day
> in LA. I hope that the RT agrees with them.
>
> On the other subject, I informed Rod about the substance of our discussion
> yesterday. He responded along the lines:
>
> ·         Staff looks forward to engage with RT.
>
> ·         The senior staff will be assigned to brief the RT according to
> our whishes.
>
> ·         Rod himself has obligations in DC that week but will join the
> meeting by telephone for 2 hours or so.
>
> ·         Audio streaming of the RT meeting will be provided
>
> ·         The written answers to the questions may take 4-6 weeks, as
> staff is heavily involved in preparations for the Brussels meeting and
> finalizing the new gTLD DAG4. But staff will do utmost to provide answers in
> the shortest time possible.
>
> Best regards
> JK
>
>  *From:* at-review-bounces at icann.org [mailto:at-review-bounces at icann.org<at-review-bounces at icann.org>]
> *On Behalf Of *Burr, Becky
> *Sent:* otrdiena, 2010. gada 27. aprîlî 0:14
>
> *To:* at-review at icann.org
> *Subject:* [At-review] Revised staff questions from Becky and Brian
>
>  Here is the document that Brian and I revised to group it into the three
> categories discussed and to trim it a bit.
>
>  B
>
>
>  *J. Beckwith Burr | WilmerHale*
> 1875 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
> Washington, DC 20006 USA
> +1 202 663 6695 (t)
> +1 202 663 6363 (f)
> becky.burr at wilmerhale.com
>
> *Please consider the environment before printing this email.*
>  ------------------------------
>  This email message and any attachments are being sent by Wilmer Cutler
> Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, are confidential, and may be privileged. If you
> are not the intended recipient, please notify us immediately—by replying to
> this message or by sending an email to postmaster at wilmerhale.com—and
> destroy all copies of this message and any attachments. Thank you.
>
> For more information about WilmerHale, please visit us at
> <http://www.wilmerhale.com/>http://www.wilmerhale.com.
>  ------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> At-review mailing list
> At-review at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-review
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> At-review mailing list
> At-review at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-review
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/at-review/attachments/20100428/5a59b1c0/attachment.html 


More information about the AT-Review mailing list