[AT-Review] Subteam #4 RFI request

Chris Disspain ceo at auda.org.au
Sat Aug 21 00:31:48 UTC 2010


Hi Warren,



Fine with me.



Cheers,



Chris Disspain | Chief Executive Officer

.au Domain Administration Ltd

 <tel:1300%20732%20929> T: 1300 732 929 |  <tel:03%208341%204112> F: 03 8341 
4112

E: ceo at auda.org.au | W: <http://www.auda.org.au/> www.auda.org.au



auDA - The Australian Domain Name Administrator





Important Notice - This email may contain information which is confidential 
and/or subject to legal privilege, and is intended for the use of the named 
addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not use, 
disclose or copy any part of this email. If you have received this email by 
mistake, please notify the sender and delete this message immediately. 
Please consider the environment before printing this email.



From: at-review-bounces at icann.org [mailto:at-review-bounces at icann.org] On 
Behalf Of wadelman at godaddy.com
Sent: Saturday, 21 August 2010 03:47
To: Peter Dengate Thrush
Cc: James Bladel; Fiona Alexander; AT-Review; guo
Subject: Re: [AT-Review] Subteam #4 RFI request



Thanks for the good catch Peter. Appreciate the prompt response. I have 
updated the attached doc to correct that.



Warren

Warren Adelman
President & COO
GoDaddy.com
twitter: http://twitter.com/asocialcontract

http://www.godaddy.com



-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [AT-Review] Subteam #4 RFI request
From: Peter Dengate Thrush <peter.dengatethrush at icann.org>
Date: Thu, August 19, 2010 10:53 pm
To: "<wadelman at godaddy.com>" <wadelman at godaddy.com>
Cc: "AT-Review " <at-review at icann.org>, James Bladel
<jbladel at godaddy.com>, Fiona Alexander <FAlexander at ntia.doc.gov>,
guo <guofeng at catr.cn>

Hi Warren,

As a preliminary point I suspect you have a reference in your request list 
wrong;

the Boston Consulting Group's recommendations in their Board Review Report 
were summarised as:



Recommendation #8: Clarify the board’s accountabilities. Initiate a program 
of discussions that explore the following propositions:

(a) Agree the accountability of ICANN’s board – to ICANN itself, the ICANN 
community and/or the Internet?

(b) Affirm that ICANN directors owe their loyalty to the board and not to 
their sponsoring organisations.

(c) Support proposals for a process to dismiss the board but ensure that the 
hurdle is quite high.

(d) Discuss possible conflict issues in the board's role overseeing the 
ICANN community where its members are appointed by those who are doing the 
work. Agree that a key role of the independent directors (via NomCom) is to 
ensure that the board continues to carries out its role without compromise.

(e) Discuss the future work division between paid staff and volunteers and 
form a view as to what this will look like in five years time.

(f) Consider the proposition that the stakeholder groups get together to 
appoint a board acceptable to all of them – rather than directly appointing 
their own representatives to the board.

You may want to look at that before sending.



I think its a comprehensive list, which will generate some useful materials



The ombudsman has comprehensive data, and subject to the redaction point 
willl, I am sure make it available.



regards





Peter



+64 4 4998959 (DDI)

+64 21499888  (mobile)

+64 4 4710672 (fax)







On Aug 20, 2010, at 9:36 AM, <wadelman at godaddy.com> <wadelman at godaddy.com> 
wrote:





ATRT members,





Attached is a draft request for information / materials from ICANN Staff and 
the Ombudsman. Please review and comment no later than EOD Monday.





Ideally I would like the ATRT Chair to submit this request with any 
modifications to ICANN and the Ombudsman by Tuesday.





If anyone can direct Subteam#4 to answers to the proposed requests in 
publicly available material please let me know. There is a brief overview, 
for example, of the activities of the Office of Ombudsman in ICANN's 2009 
Annual Report. The annual report refers to additional materials on the 
Ombudsman's website, located here:





http://www.icann.org/ombudsman/program.html





In going through these materials, they seem out of date (2006-2007).








Warren

Warren Adelman
President & COO
GoDaddy.com <http://GoDaddy.com/>
warren at godaddy.com
twitter: http://twitter.com/asocialcontract

http://www.godaddy.com <http://www.godaddy.com/>

<Subteam 4 - RFI from ICANN Staff and Ombudsman Draft 
1.doc>_______________________________________________
AT-Review mailing list
AT-Review at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-review





__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature 
database 5381 (20100820) __________

The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

http://www.eset.com


__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature 
database 5383 (20100820) __________

The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

http://www.eset.com

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/at-review/attachments/20100821/42d3b998/attachment.html 


More information about the AT-Review mailing list