[AT-Review] ATRT Schedule; something is missing

[Fabio Colasanti]

Wednesday or Thursday is far too late.   We need to meet today or tomorrow.   Can we not meet at the Hilton hotel at 5.30?   I am sure that they will have a room, otherwise we can meet in the bar.  Too bad for the technical equipment, webstreaming and all the rest.

Fabio

==========================
> Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2010 08:00:57 -0800
> From: Alice Jansen <alice.jansen at icann.org>
> To: "briancute at afilias.info" <briancute at afilias.info>,       
>   "'Fabio Colasanti'" 	<fabio at colasanti.it>,         "at-review at icann.org" 
> <at-review at icann.org>
> CC: Olof Nordling <olof.nordling at icann.org>
> Subject: RE: [AT-Review] ATRT Schedule; something is missing
> ==========================
> 
> Dear Brian,
> Dear Review Team Members,
> 
> I am afraid there is no room available for today at that time.
> 
> We would be able to book a meeting room either on Wednesday as 
> from 10:00 or Thursday afternoon but would need to know soon.
> 
> Please advise whether you are available then. This could also 
> be discussed later on today.
> 
> Please also note that it is too late to have recordings arranged 
> - too short notice.
> 
> Many thanks in advance,
> 
> Best regards
> 
> Alice
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brian Cute [mailto:briancute at afilias.info]
> Sent: Sunday, December 05, 2010 8:49 AM
> To: 'Fabio Colasanti'; at-review at icann.org; Alice Jansen
> Subject: RE: [AT-Review] ATRT Schedule; something is missing
> 
> Fabio,
> 
> Thanks for your reminder. We can meet directly after our meeting 
> with the
> Board today which ends at 5:30p.m.  We have the cocktail reception 
> with the
> Board at 7:00p.m. which allows 1.5 hours.  Alice, could you find 
> an
> available room for us.
> 
> Regards,
> Brian
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Fabio Colasanti [mailto:fabio at colasanti.it]
> Sent: Saturday, December 04, 2010 7:26 PM
> To: at-review at icann.org; Alice Jansen
> Subject: [AT-Review] ATRT Schedule; something is missing
> 
> 
> Dear all,
> 
> the ATRT schedule just circulated does not foresee a slot (slots) 
> for
> discussions within the group.  When we had last discussed the 
> Cartagena
> schedule over the telephone I remember distinctly that we had 
> agreed to
> having at least another meeting among ourselves (on Monday) after 
> having met
> the Board.
> 
> We should exchanging views on the comments received.   The most 
> important
> and challenging point made by a number of contributors was that 
> the ATRT
> should "walk the talk" by explaining in detail what it has done 
> with the
> input it has received all along its work.   This is a tough task. 
>  We should
> examine collectively the points raised (not that many) and agree 
> on what we
> should give as reasons for having followed or not followed them. 
>   We cannot
> ask the Board to give a full explanation of its decisions including 
> the
> follow-up given to the inputs received and not to that ourselves.
> 
> The comments we have received touch a number of difficult issues 
> (from the
> absence of binding review mechanisms to suggestions that ICANN 
> should be
> incorporated in a more "international" jurisdiction).   Then 
> there are a
> number of general comments about the readability/presentation 
> of the whole
> document.
> 
> There is also a very reasonable suggestion to comment on our 
> experience as a
> Review Team and give suggestions for the work of future Review 
> Teams.
> 
> I have the impression that our work is not over yet.
> 
> Fabio
> 
> _______________________________________________
> AT-Review mailing list
> AT-Review at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-review
>