[AT-Review] Accountability and Transparency: Test

[Cheryl Langdon-Orr]

Hi Peter  this is just a test of a simple survey  that  Ralph at Big Pulse
(who are professionals at all this) put together for me for us to look at as
an option/ adjunct to the other methods we are using for data collection.
 They are all based on the questions to the Community from our Call
for Public Comments set...  We can make them whatever we want (or not use
the tool at all)  but it is only with a graded response  tool that we can
get metrics to measure change from opinions /views held now to compare with
those collected  in the future (using same or different tool)...  I have
c.c'd back to the list as I suspect you questions will also be being asked
by others and we can perhaps discuss more at tomorrows teleconference if
time in the Agenda can be found;  That said in answer to your other
points...

Are they intended to be final?  No
Who compiled them, and with what goals?  See above
Who selects those answering? By what method?  ATRT can  or we could use
methods that the survey experts can advise us of as Big Pulse does do public
polling and offers many levels of service; But as the audience needs to know
ICANN rather than be 'man in the street'   I believe our normal ICANN
outreach methods would do just fine if we choose to use the tool...
Are they weighted according to any factors, such as whether they form part
of the ICANN community - and if so which part? No they are not in this test
set, but certainly can be; Again  we can decide or take advice from experts.


Cheryl Langdon-Orr
(CLO)



On 12 July 2010 13:59, Peter Dengate Thrush <barrister at chambers.gen.nz>wrote:

> Hi Cheryl
> I can log in just fine.
>
> I think the questions are so simplistic that the sum of the answers is not
> going to provide much useful data.
> Are they intended to be final? Who compiled them, and with what goals? Who
> selects those answering? By what method? Are they weighted according to any
> factors, such as whether they form part of the ICANN community - and if so
> which part?
>
> I am reminded that polling is a complicated science, and that to get
> statistically significant data we could take some expert advice.
>
> Long time VP of InternetNZ David Farrar,  who also runs most of the most
> popular Kiwi blogs, is a professional pollster/surveyor.
> I'd be happy to see if he'd be interested in providing some expertise?
>
> regards
>
>
>
> Peter
>
>
> On Jul 12, 2010, at 3:49 PM, Cheryl Langdon-Orr wrote:
>
>  Dear Peter,
>
>  Please follow the link below to test out a survey tool that will allow
> our Questions for the Community to be answered in this alternate form and
> provide for some measurable data (benchmarked opinion ratings etc) to be
> collected for our work...
>
> The link below will log you in automatically. See how usable you find this
> approach and what changes you might wish to make to such an approach. Note
> the reply email address on this test is mine but in a 'go live' model it
> would be the ATRT Public Comments address used...
>
> CLICK HERE<https://www.bigpulse.com/rr?aA8BADINBszjwWpaLVNTaSVVh24dymZ6T6JVAmlEEFN1lw>to see the survey.
>
>  Cheryl Langdon-Orr
> (CLO)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/at-review/attachments/20100712/26fe7cbe/attachment.html