[AT-Review] Proposed response re: budget

[Manal Ismail]

Thanks Peter ..

Brian, I tried to benefit from the time zone differences, in case this
was not submitted yet, and do the necessary changes (replacing
subcommittee with working group) .. I also took the liberty to change
the word pending in 'pending recommendations' to 'final recommendations'
as per Chris' suggestion .. not sure if this has changed the meaning you
had in mind .. One more thing, in case we're submitting this today, I've
also changed the word 'today' in 'today, July 19, 2010' to 'on' so it
now reads 'on July 19, 2010' ..

I hope this version takes into consideration all suggestions and is not
too late ..

--Manal

-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Dengate Thrush [mailto:peter.dengatethrush at icann.org] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2010 8:00 AM
To: Manal Ismail
Cc: Chris Disspain; at-review at icann.org
Subject: Re: [AT-Review] Proposed response re: budget

Hi Manal, all

Its a "Board Working Group".
If changes are being made that could be tidied up also.

regards

Peter 


On Jul 20, 2010, at 4:35 PM, Manal Ismail wrote:

> Thanks Brian, I also agree to the attached with Chris' comments ..
> I've just edited a few typos also marked in track changes ..
> BTW, is it called the 'Board Committee' or 'Board subcommittee' ? I'm
not really sure and could not find it on the web ..
> 
> --Manal 
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> From: at-review-bounces at icann.org on behalf of Chris Disspain
> Sent: Mon 19/07/2010 10:48 PM
> To: briancute at afilias.info; at-review at icann.org
> Subject: Re: [AT-Review] Proposed response re: budget
> 
> 
> 
> Hi Brian,
> 
> 
> 
> My natural inclination as a lawyer has meant that I have made some
amendments. Hope they are useful.
> 
> 
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> 
> 
> Chris Disspain | Chief Executive Officer
> 
> .au Domain Administration Ltd
> 
> T: 1300 732 929 | F: 03 8341 4112
> 
> E: ceo at auda.org.au | W:www.auda.org.au <http://www.auda.org.au/> 
> 
> 
> 
> auDA - The Australian Domain Name Administrator
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Important Notice - This email may contain information which is
confidential and/or subject to legal privilege, and is intended for the
use of the named addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient,
you must not use, disclose or copy any part of this email. If you have
received this email by mistake, please notify the sender and delete this
message immediately. Please consider the environment before printing
this email.
> 
> 
> 
> From: at-review-bounces at icann.org [mailto:at-review-bounces at icann.org]
On Behalf Of Brian Cute
> Sent: Tuesday, 20 July 2010 04:41
> To: at-review at icann.org
> Subject: [AT-Review] Proposed response re: budget
> 
> 
> 
> RT,
> 
> 
> 
> Attached is a proposed response to the Board budget subcommittee.
Please indicate approval or not and any NECESSARY edits immediately.
> 
> 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Brian
> 
> 
> 
> __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus
signature database 5292 (20100719) __________
> 
> The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
> 
> http://www.eset.com <http://www.eset.com/> 
> 
> <ATRTbudgetresponse CD + MI red
line.doc>_______________________________________________
> AT-Review mailing list
> AT-Review at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-review

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ATRTbudgetresponse CD + MI red line ver2.doc
Type: application/msword
Size: 36864 bytes
Desc: ATRTbudgetresponse CD + MI red line ver2.doc
Url : http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/at-review/attachments/20100720/90daa0e2/attachment-0001.doc