[AT-Review] revised questions for GAC

Erick Iriarte Ahon eiriarte at lactld.org
Thu Jun 3 20:50:31 UTC 2010


I'm agree with Becky and Manal, in special because some GAC members will not be in brussels and maybe they can send the answers by email before.

Erick



El 03/06/2010, a las 15:42, Burr, Becky escribió:

> 
> I strongly agree that this needs to be shared as soon as possible
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Manal Ismail [mailto:manal at tra.gov.eg] 
> Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2010 12:16 PM
> To: Burr, Becky; at-review at icann.org
> Subject: RE: [AT-Review] revised questions for GAC
> 
> Dear all ..
> 
> Is it ok also to share this referenced version of questons with the GAC
> ?
> I think it's important ti share the prepared questions with the relevant
> groups beforehand to ensure a fruitful discussion ..
> I have noticed that the questions to the GAC & GAC-Board JWG are both in
> the form of letters that have to be signed, Brian how would you like to
> proceed ?
> 
> Kind Regards
> 
> --Manal
> 
> N.B.: the 2-hour GAC meeting is planned to be one hour closed and one
> hour open ..
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> From: at-review-bounces at icann.org on behalf of Burr, Becky
> Sent: Fri 28/05/2010 01:45 AM
> To: at-review at icann.org
> Subject: [AT-Review] revised questions for GAC
> 
> 
> These are revised to fix a few typos, and to add a final question
> suggested by Erik.  Please let me know your thoughts, comments,
> suggestions.
> 
> Best, 
> 
> Becky
> 
> _______________________________________________
> AT-Review mailing list
> AT-Review at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-review
> 





More information about the AT-Review mailing list