[AT-Review] Work items

[Brian Cute]

Willie and Olivier,

 

Could you forward the text of the working definition that the Team put
together during our session.  I would like to include it in the Preliminary
Report before we post the Report.  Thanks.

 

Regards,

Brian

 

From: olivier.muron at orange-ftgroup.com
[mailto:olivier.muron at orange-ftgroup.com] 
Sent: Friday, May 14, 2010 9:47 AM
To: wcurrie at apc.org; briancute at afilias.info
Cc: at-review at icann.org
Subject: RE: [AT-Review] Work items

 

Willie, Brian, all,

 

I rephrased the first two questions. I don't feel at ease beginning the
consultation with " Do you think there is a problem...".  I think it might
be better to begin with a more neutral question."What is your general
assessment of...".

 

I added a general question on ICANN's commitment to the interests of global
Internet users, 

 

Best,

 

Olivier

 

  _____  

De : at-review-bounces at icann.org [mailto:at-review-bounces at icann.org] De la
part de Willie Currie
Envoyé : vendredi 14 mai 2010 15:20
À : briancute at afilias.info
Cc : at-review at icann.org
Objet : Re: [AT-Review] Work items

Brian, all

Here is the latest version of the questions, with a reformulation of
question 4 by Fabio.

Best
Willie

  Brian Cute wrote: 

RT,

Our most immediate work item is the draft questions for the Community that
were drafted by Cheryl, Olivier and Willie.  We have a deadline of May 15th
to submit the questions for posting.  Please review the questions and post
any proposed edits so we can meet this deadline.

Looking forward, since paragraph 9.1 of the AoC has 5 areas of review (the
Board, the GAC, public input, public support of decisions and policy
development process), I suggest that we establish “sub-committees” headed by
two members of the RT who oversee the work of each area of review.  The two
responsible members would ensure that the review work remains focused and
aligned with the RT’s methodology and on time for deliverables in December.
The sub- committee approach would not prevent any RT member from
participating directly in the work of any of the 5 areas of review – it is
intended to ensure organization and efficiency given our the limited number
of members on the RT.

If this approach is acceptable, please think about the area that you would
like to volunteer for and indicate that in advance of our next scheduled
call.  The Doodle for our next call is almost complete.  If you haven’t
indicated your availability, please do so and we will send out the meeting
maker and telephone bridge.

Regards,

Brian




  _____  



 
_______________________________________________
AT-Review mailing list
AT-Review at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-review
  

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/at-review/attachments/20100514/bc1905dd/attachment.html