[AT-Review] Questions for the ICANN Community as Call for Public Comment => was Work items

Cheryl Langdon-Orr langdonorr at gmail.com
Sat May 15 01:04:07 UTC 2010


Taking the last red-line version and accepting the changes (due to no
evidence to the contrary)  I've prepared  the attached  in a form that
should allow for Carol Cornell <carole.cornell at icann.org>, ( who is the
person we need to deal with to get these questions out as a 'call for public
comment'  BTW) to as quickly as possible fill the template in and send out
the announce by Monday which then allows for the 45 day comment to run over
the Brussels meeting time.

Brian as ATRT Chair you should (as soon as the ATRT signs of on the text)
get this over to Carole ASAP  (I've taken the liberty of asking Heidi to
give her a 'heads up' that it will be forthcoming post haste)  being a
Friday in MdR and our dates  time critical...

Attached is a word, ODT and PDF version of the final mark up of questions
from the latest re-line version (as page 2) and the preamble ans placeholder
materials that are needed for the Public Comments template...  Our Work Team
also discussed the development of survey tools that will allow more
quantitative information to be sourced from the community and I will
forwards some drafts of those concepts  in the near future, but they are not
as time critical as this 'Call for Public Comment' is...


Cheryl Langdon-Orr
(CLO)



On 15 May 2010 07:30, Brian Cute <briancute at afilias.info> wrote:

>  Willie,
>
>
>
> Thanks for that.  I recall the group deciding to add a second paragraph to
> the one you quoted.  Do you have that by chance?  I will look at the
> documents as well to try to find it.
>
>
>
> Best,
>
> Brian
>
>
>
> *From:* Willie Currie [mailto:wcurrie at apc.org]
> *Sent:* Friday, May 14, 2010 12:18 PM
> *To:* briancute at afilias.info
> *Cc:* olivier.muron at orange-ftgroup.com; at-review at icann.org
> *Subject:* Re: [AT-Review] Work items
>
>
>
> Brian
>
> I have the following:
>
> Accountability refers to a process by which individuals and organizations
> are answerable for their actions, decisions and processes on an ongoing
> basis and for the consequences that follow from them.
>
> Willie
>
> Brian Cute wrote:
>
> Willie and Olivier,
>
>
>
> Could you forward the text of the working definition that the Team put
> together during our session.  I would like to include it in the Preliminary
> Report before we post the Report.  Thanks.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Brian
>
>
>
> *From:* olivier.muron at orange-ftgroup.com [
> mailto:olivier.muron at orange-ftgroup.com <olivier.muron at orange-ftgroup.com>]
>
> *Sent:* Friday, May 14, 2010 9:47 AM
> *To:* wcurrie at apc.org; briancute at afilias.info
> *Cc:* at-review at icann.org
> *Subject:* RE: [AT-Review] Work items
>
>
>
> Willie, Brian, all,
>
>
>
> I rephrased the first two questions. I don't feel at ease beginning the
> consultation with " Do you think there is a problem...".  I think it might
> be better to begin with a more neutral question."What is your general
> assessment of...".
>
>
>
> I added a general question on ICANN's commitment to the interests of global
> Internet users,
>
>
>
> Best,
>
>
>
> Olivier
>
>
>  ------------------------------
>
> *De :* at-review-bounces at icann.org [mailto:at-review-bounces at icann.org<at-review-bounces at icann.org>]
> *De la part de* Willie Currie
> *Envoyé :* vendredi 14 mai 2010 15:20
> *À :* briancute at afilias.info
> *Cc :* at-review at icann.org
> *Objet :* Re: [AT-Review] Work items
>
> Brian, all
>
> Here is the latest version of the questions, with a reformulation of
> question 4 by Fabio.
>
> Best
> Willie
>
>   Brian Cute wrote:
>
> RT,
>
> Our most immediate work item is the draft questions for the Community that
> were drafted by Cheryl, Olivier and Willie.  We have a *deadline of May 15
> th* to submit the questions for posting.  Please review the questions and
> post any proposed edits so we can meet this deadline.
>
> Looking forward, since paragraph 9.1 of the AoC has 5 areas of review (the
> Board, the GAC, public input, public support of decisions and policy
> development process), I suggest that we establish “sub-committees” headed by
> two members of the RT who oversee the work of each area of review.  The two
> responsible members would ensure that the review work remains focused and
> aligned with the RT’s methodology and on time for deliverables in December.
> The sub- committee approach would not prevent any RT member from
> participating directly in the work of any of the 5 areas of review – it is
> intended to ensure organization and efficiency given our the limited number
> of members on the RT.
>
> If this approach is acceptable, please think about the area that you would
> like to volunteer for and indicate that in advance of our next scheduled
> call.  The Doodle for our next call is almost complete.  If you haven’t
> indicated your availability, please do so and we will send out the meeting
> maker and telephone bridge.
>
> Regards,
>
> Brian
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> AT-Review mailing list
>
> AT-Review at icann.org
>
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-review
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AT-Review mailing list
> AT-Review at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-review
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/at-review/attachments/20100515/4bbca2ea/attachment.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Initial Questions to the Community on Accountability and	Transparency within ICANN..pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 76946 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/at-review/attachments/20100515/4bbca2ea/attachment.pdf 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Initial Questions to the Community on Accountability and	Transparency within ICANN..doc
Type: application/msword
Size: 24576 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/at-review/attachments/20100515/4bbca2ea/attachment.doc 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Initial Questions to the Community on Accountability and	Transparency within ICANN..odt
Type: application/vnd.oasis.opendocument.text
Size: 25826 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/at-review/attachments/20100515/4bbca2ea/attachment.odt 


More information about the AT-Review mailing list