[AT-Review] Work items

Manal Ismail manal at tra.gov.eg
Sat May 15 08:40:53 UTC 2010

Thanks Brian for the excellent suggestion ..
I agree that having champions for each work item would ensure a balanced distribution of focus, discussion and review of all items and would ensure progress on each ..
Warren, you mentioned a valid point on the relevance of some items .. I personally think creation of sub-groups has more to do with keeping an eye on the progress, outputs (questionnairs, surverys, ...... final recommendations) & meeting the deadlines .. So if we don't plan to come up with a seperate set of recommendations to each item then it only makes sense to merge related items and have single leadership for those but if not then I think it will be necessary to have someone (preferably two) keeping track of the progress on this specific item and keeping track of its reccomendations and related timelines as we go ..
Kind Regards


من: at-review-bounces at icann.org بالنيابة عن wadelman at godaddy.com
تاريخ الإرسال: الجمعة 14/05/2010 07:08 م
إلى: briancute at afilias.info
نسخة: James Bladel; at-review at icann.org
الموضوع: Re: [AT-Review] Work items


I would suggest combining 9.1, sections a., c., and d. into a single work team because elements of each are related to the others. I'd also suggest the initial focus of the work team would be:

1.  Board Decision Inputs (Focus: Staff Reports to Board)
2.  Visibility in to Board Decision Process (Focus:  Board Transcripts & Recordings)
3.  Community Oversight of Board Decisions (Focus: Appeals Mechanism for Board Decisions)
So I think there would be three work teams - 1) a., c., d.; 2) b.; 3) e.

I would be happy to volunteer for team 1.

On another note, did we shift con call times by 6 or 8 hours?


Warren Adelman
President & COO
GoDaddy.com <http://GoDaddy.com> 
warren at godaddy.com
tel. (480)505-8835
fax. (480)275-3990
twitter: <http://twitter.com/asocialcontract> <http://twitter.com/asocialcontract> http://twitter.com/asocialcontract
<http://www.godaddy.com> <http://www.godaddy.com> http://www.godaddy.com

	-------- Original Message --------
	Subject: [AT-Review] Work items
	From: "Brian Cute" <briancute at afilias.info>
	Date: Thu, May 13, 2010 4:11 pm
	To: <at-review at icann.org>
	Our most immediate work item is the draft questions for the Community that were drafted by Cheryl, Olivier and Willie.  We have a deadline of May 15th to submit the questions for posting.  Please review the questions and post any proposed edits so we can meet this deadline.
	Looking forward, since paragraph 9.1 of the AoC has 5 areas of review (the Board, the GAC, public input, public support of decisions and policy development process), I suggest that we establish “sub-committees” headed by two members of the RT who oversee the work of each area of review.  The two responsible members would ensure that the review work remains focused and aligned with the RT’s methodology and on time for deliverables in December.  The sub- committee approach would not prevent any RT member from participating directly in the work of any of the 5 areas of review – it is intended to ensure organization and efficiency given our the limited number of members on the RT.
	If this approach is acceptable, please think about the area that you would like to volunteer for and indicate that in advance of our next scheduled call.  The Doodle for our next call is almost complete.  If you haven’t indicated your availability, please do so and we will send out the meeting maker and telephone bridge.

	AT-Review mailing list
	<mailto:AT-Review at icann.org> AT-Review at icann.org
	<https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-review> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-review

More information about the AT-Review mailing list