[AT-Review] Questions for Community - final call
louie at equinix.com
Sun May 16 17:20:27 UTC 2010
I like your thought on that. However, may I suggest that it be incorporated into the existing question? Something like:
7. What is your assessment of the processes by which ICANN receives public input from the English-speaking community and non-English-speaking community?
From: at-review-bounces at icann.org [at-review-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of ZHANG Xinsheng [zhangxinsheng at miit.gov.cn]
Sent: Sunday, May 16, 2010 7:31 AM
To: olivier.muron at orange-ftgroup.com; briancute at afilias.info; at-review at icann.org
Subject: Re: [AT-Review] Questions for Community - final call
I have added a sub-question within Q.7. I suggest the issue of non-English community input be included.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 33792 bytes
Url : http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/at-review/attachments/20100516/42198bb7/attachment.doc
More information about the AT-Review