[AT-Review] suggested questions for the GAC meeting
Erick Iriarte Ahon
eiriarte at lactld.org
Thu May 27 19:32:13 UTC 2010
i'm agree with the document and the questions, only had a issue that i'm not clear how add.
Some ccTLD's are not members of ccNSO but their governments are involved in the GAC; in other cases you have ccTLDs in ccNSO but not participation of their governments in GAC. And sometimes the ccTLD go in one way an the gov in other way.
Could be interesting to know how the govs decide to participate in the GAC? they have independence from the participation of ccTLDs in ccNSO?, they working cooperative? are independent?
I'm not clear of how develop the question, but know how are the relation between cctlds/govs (ccNSO / GAC) could help to understand better the development of policies that affect ccTLD's
El 26/05/2010, a las 16:17, Burr, Becky escribió:
> Please provide input on the attached questions.
> Also, any other input on the previously circulated methodology?
> J. Beckwith Burr | WilmerHale
> 1875 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
> Washington, DC 20006 USA
> +1 202 663 6695 (t)
> +1 202 663 6363 (f)
> becky.burr at wilmerhale.com
> Please consider the environment before printing this email.
> This email message and any attachments are being sent by Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, are confidential, and may be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify us immediately—by replying to this message or by sending an email to postmaster at wilmerhale.com—and destroy all copies of this message and any attachments. Thank you.
> For more information about WilmerHale, please visit us at http://www.wilmerhale.com.
> AT-Review mailing list
> AT-Review at icann.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the AT-Review