[AT-Review] Revised WG#4 Draft Recommendations

[Peter Dengate Thrush]

Thanks Warren and Team,
Thanks for this work.

Although I have mentioned it before, you do not refer specifically to the work that was done in 1999 on this topic, and which I think might be helpful.
Although that was a study under the old bylaws, you might find the principles and the discussion interesting - if only to record how long this issue has been debated!

See  www.icann.org/en/meetings/santiago/irac-final-report.htm

I look forward to working on this in Boston.

regards


Peter 



On Oct 8, 2010, at 6:25 AM, <wadelman at godaddy.com> <wadelman at godaddy.com> wrote:

> Attached for review and discussion is the latest version of WG#4 draft recommendations.
> 
> These recommendations touch on:
> 
> -Ombudsman
> -Reconsideration Request
> -Community Re-vote
> -Independent Review Panel
> 
> We look forward to discussing in Boston. As a logistical note, I will be participating remotely in the meeting. James Bladel will attend on site.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Warren
> 
> Warren Adelman
> President & COO
> GoDaddy.com
> warren at godaddy.com
> twitter: http://twitter.com/asocialcontract
> http://www.godaddy.com
> <WG4 Draft Recommendations v4.doc>_______________________________________________
> AT-Review mailing list
> AT-Review at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-review

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/at-review/attachments/20101008/66145f87/attachment.html