[AT-Review] Draft of Public Comment document

[Manal Ismail]

Dear Brian ..
 
Thanks for your efforts ..
In addition to Fabio's edits, please find attached some minor edits marked in track changes ..
I have already gone through WG2 draft separately, to which I have no further comments and which I understand will be copied as is to this doc. but I still have to go through the new draft of WG4 which you have just sent ..
 
Frankly, after going through the whole document, I'm more in favour of gathering all recommendations into an executive summary at the begining of the document .. but I would go by whatever the team agrees on ..
 
Talk to you soon ..
 
Kind Regards
 
--Manal
 


________________________________

من: at-review-bounces at icann.org بالنيابة عن Brian Cute
تاريخ الإرسال: الاثنين 18/10/2010 01:04 ص
إلى: 'Larry Strickling'; at-review at icann.org
نسخة: ugasser at cyber.law.harvard.edu; 'Caroline Nolan'
الموضوع: Re: [AT-Review] Draft of Public Comment document



Thanks Larry.  I will cut this into the Public Comment document.

 

From: Larry Strickling [mailto:Lstrickling at ntia.doc.gov] 
Sent: Sunday, October 17, 2010 2:14 PM
To: briancute at afilias.info; at-review at icann.org
Cc: ugasser at cyber.law.harvard.edu; 'Caroline Nolan'
Subject: RE: [AT-Review] Draft of Public Comment document

 

Updated Working Group 2 report attached.

 

From: at-review-bounces at icann.org [mailto:at-review-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Brian Cute
Sent: Friday, October 15, 2010 12:19 AM
To: at-review at icann.org
Cc: ugasser at cyber.law.harvard.edu; 'Caroline Nolan'
Subject: [AT-Review] Draft of Public Comment document

 

RT,

 

Attached is a draft of the document for Public Comment.  Please note the following:

 

-          WG1 is complete 

-          WG2 – waiting on Larry’s next draft which will include minimal edits based on discussion in Boston

-          WG3 – contains revised Recommendation #8 based on discussion in Boston

-          WG4 – contains revised Recommendations based on discussion in Boston

 

Please review the entire draft and provide any edits specific to the revised recommendations in WG3 and WG4 documents as well as edits on the “wrapper” document that precedes the WG texts.  I will incorporate RT edits and continue to refine the draft.

 

Regards,

Brian

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ATRTdraft 15-10-2010 - redline MI.doc
Type: application/msword
Size: 196608 bytes
Desc: ATRTdraft 15-10-2010 - redline MI.doc
Url : http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/at-review/attachments/20101018/2afa2888/attachment-0001.doc