[AT-Review] Version 10

[Brian Cute]

RT,

 

Attached is the next version.  The following version will be our final
version that is sent to the translation team.  If we do not reach agreement
on WG4, I will sent the balance of the document to the translation team to
begin that process while we finalize WG4.

 

Edits in this version include:  Warren's edits from his email yesterday and
Olivier's edits from today.  My view of WG4:  we have represented that there
is a divergence of opinion on the ATRT regarding the issue of a binding
appeals mechanism.  Olivier's proposed edits are designed to address the
concern that we are asking ICANN to undertake a review when the ATRT should
be doing a review and offering firm recommendations.  I have added some
language in the Findings section of WG4 that explains the ATRT view of the
incomplete IIC work.  Olivier's language narrows the WG4 recommendations to
the specific issues that have been identified by the ATRT with respect to
the 3 appeals mechanisms.  I believe this is a balance approach to address
the divergent views of the Review Team and a way to make recommendations
that call for concrete action as opposed to an open review.

 

At this point, the document needs to go forward if we are to respect our
intention to have the comment period close prior to Cartagena.  

 

Please submit your final view on the proposed language.  If there is serious
dissent, dissenting opinions will have to be drafted.

 

Regards,

Brian

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/at-review/attachments/20101023/dfee0aa9/attachment-0001.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ATRTdraftMaster10.0.doc
Type: application/msword
Size: 243712 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/at-review/attachments/20101023/dfee0aa9/attachment-0001.doc