[AT-Review] WG next drafts and Interview Protocols

[Peter Dengate Thrush]

I shall be at a regional igf meeting in Helsinki
On Monday and haven't yet worked out the time shifts but may miss some  
of this call
Regards

Peter

On 18/09/2010, at 12:47 AM, "Brian Cute" <briancute at afilias.info> wrote:

> RT,
>
>
>
> For our call on Monday, each WG should have the next version of  
> their respective drafts circulated to the list in advance.  We will  
> focus our discussions on 2 areas:
>
>
>
> 1.        Review each WG draft list of questions
>
>
>
> -          Should be a set of “overarching questions” that ask  
> whether specific issues are being adequately addressed AND a set of  
> questions that ask whether particular processes “can be improved by 
> …”
>
> -          We need to  determine if the list of questions is  
> comprehensive/complete
>
>
>
> 2.       Review the “fact checking” requirements (document  
> procurement and review/interviews with Board, Staff, Community) that 
>  each WG needs to complete before their respective final drafts can  
> be written.  Check the remaining “fact checking” tasks against  
> the timeline to be certain that each WG can meet the deadlines prior 
>  to Boston.
>
>
>
> With regard to any interviews that each WG needs to do, attached is  
> recommended protocols for conducting interviews.  If you have any  
> suggested edits to the protocols, please provide them right away so  
> each WG can operate under the same set of protocols.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Brian
>
> <Interviews.doc>
> _______________________________________________
> AT-Review mailing list
> AT-Review at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-review