<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Brian, all<br>
<br>
Here is the latest version of the questions, with a reformulation of
question 4 by Fabio.<br>
<br>
Best<br>
Willie<br>
<br>
Brian Cute wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:019101caf2f1$93537200$b9fa5600$@info" type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; ">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 12 (filtered medium)">
<style>
<!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal-compose;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;}
@page Section1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.Section1
{page:Section1;}
-->
</style>
<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
<div class="Section1">
<p class="MsoNormal">RT,<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Our most immediate work item is the draft
questions for the
Community that were drafted by Cheryl, Olivier and Willie. We have a <u>deadline
of May 15<sup>th</sup></u> to submit the questions for posting. Please
review the questions and post any proposed edits so we can meet this
deadline.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Looking forward, since paragraph 9.1 of the AoC
has 5 areas
of review (the Board, the GAC, public input, public support of
decisions and
policy development process), I suggest that we establish
“sub-committees”
headed by two members of the RT who oversee the work of each area of
review. The two responsible members would ensure that the review work
remains focused and aligned with the RT’s methodology and on time for
deliverables in December. The sub- committee approach would not
prevent
any RT member from participating directly in the work of any of the 5
areas of
review – it is intended to ensure organization and efficiency given our
the limited number of members on the RT.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">If this approach is acceptable, please think
about the area
that you would like to volunteer for and indicate that in advance of
our next
scheduled call. The Doodle for our next call is almost complete. If
you haven’t indicated your availability, please do so and we will send
out the meeting maker and telephone bridge.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Regards,<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Brian<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<pre wrap="">
<hr size="4" width="90%">
_______________________________________________
AT-Review mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:AT-Review@icann.org">AT-Review@icann.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-review">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-review</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>