<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:x="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:excel" xmlns:p="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:powerpoint" xmlns:a="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:access" xmlns:dt="uuid:C2F41010-65B3-11d1-A29F-00AA00C14882" xmlns:s="uuid:BDC6E3F0-6DA3-11d1-A2A3-00AA00C14882" xmlns:rs="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:rowset" xmlns:z="#RowsetSchema" xmlns:b="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:publisher" xmlns:ss="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:spreadsheet" xmlns:c="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:component:spreadsheet" xmlns:odc="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:odc" xmlns:oa="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:activation" xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40" xmlns:q="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" xmlns:rtc="http://microsoft.com/officenet/conferencing" xmlns:D="DAV:" xmlns:Repl="http://schemas.microsoft.com/repl/" xmlns:mt="http://schemas.microsoft.com/sharepoint/soap/meetings/" xmlns:x2="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/excel/2003/xml" xmlns:ppda="http://www.passport.com/NameSpace.xsd" xmlns:ois="http://schemas.microsoft.com/sharepoint/soap/ois/" xmlns:dir="http://schemas.microsoft.com/sharepoint/soap/directory/" xmlns:ds="http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#" xmlns:dsp="http://schemas.microsoft.com/sharepoint/dsp" xmlns:udc="http://schemas.microsoft.com/data/udc" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:sub="http://schemas.microsoft.com/sharepoint/soap/2002/1/alerts/" xmlns:ec="http://www.w3.org/2001/04/xmlenc#" xmlns:sp="http://schemas.microsoft.com/sharepoint/" xmlns:sps="http://schemas.microsoft.com/sharepoint/soap/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:udcs="http://schemas.microsoft.com/data/udc/soap" xmlns:udcxf="http://schemas.microsoft.com/data/udc/xmlfile" xmlns:udcp2p="http://schemas.microsoft.com/data/udc/parttopart" xmlns:wf="http://schemas.microsoft.com/sharepoint/soap/workflow/" xmlns:dsss="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2006/digsig-setup" xmlns:dssi="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2006/digsig" xmlns:mdssi="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/package/2006/digital-signature" xmlns:mver="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/markup-compatibility/2006" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns:mrels="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/package/2006/relationships" xmlns:spwp="http://microsoft.com/sharepoint/webpartpages" xmlns:ex12t="http://schemas.microsoft.com/exchange/services/2006/types" xmlns:ex12m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/exchange/services/2006/messages" xmlns:pptsl="http://schemas.microsoft.com/sharepoint/soap/SlideLibrary/" xmlns:spsl="http://microsoft.com/webservices/SharePointPortalServer/PublishedLinksService" xmlns:Z="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:" xmlns:st="" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 12 (filtered medium)">
<style>
<!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Wingdings;
panose-1:5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0;}
@font-face
{font-family:Wingdings;
panose-1:5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Consolas;
panose-1:2 11 6 9 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Verdana;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
p.MsoPlainText, li.MsoPlainText, div.MsoPlainText
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"Plain Text Char";
margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:10.5pt;
font-family:Consolas;}
p.MsoListParagraph, li.MsoListParagraph, div.MsoListParagraph
{mso-style-priority:34;
margin-top:0cm;
margin-right:0cm;
margin-bottom:0cm;
margin-left:36.0pt;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";}
span.PlainTextChar
{mso-style-name:"Plain Text Char";
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"Plain Text";
font-family:Consolas;}
span.EmailStyle20
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:windowtext;}
span.EmailStyle21
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";
color:#7030A0;}
span.EmailStyle22
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D;}
span.EmailStyle23
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
margin:72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
/* List Definitions */
@list l0
{mso-list-id:143396199;
mso-list-type:hybrid;
mso-list-template-ids:392318630 1350221362 67698691 67698693 67698689 67698691 67698693 67698689 67698691 67698693;}
@list l0:level1
{mso-level-start-at:2;
mso-level-number-format:bullet;
mso-level-text:-;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-18.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri;
mso-bidi-font-family:Arial;}
@list l1
{mso-list-id:1481926712;
mso-list-type:hybrid;
mso-list-template-ids:1890762400 134807567 134807577 134807579 134807567 134807577 134807579 134807567 134807577 134807579;}
@list l1:level1
{mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-18.0pt;}
@list l1:level2
{mso-level-tab-stop:72.0pt;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-18.0pt;}
@list l1:level3
{mso-level-tab-stop:108.0pt;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-18.0pt;}
@list l1:level4
{mso-level-tab-stop:144.0pt;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-18.0pt;}
@list l1:level5
{mso-level-tab-stop:180.0pt;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-18.0pt;}
@list l1:level6
{mso-level-tab-stop:216.0pt;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-18.0pt;}
@list l1:level7
{mso-level-tab-stop:252.0pt;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-18.0pt;}
@list l1:level8
{mso-level-tab-stop:288.0pt;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-18.0pt;}
@list l1:level9
{mso-level-tab-stop:324.0pt;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-18.0pt;}
ol
{margin-bottom:0cm;}
ul
{margin-bottom:0cm;}
-->
</style>
<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang=EN-US link=blue vlink=purple>
<div class=WordSection1>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'>Thanks Brian ..<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'>A few remarks on version 10:<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoListParagraph style='text-indent:-18.0pt;mso-list:l0 level1 lfo3'><![if !supportLists]><span
style='color:#1F497D'><span style='mso-list:Ignore'>-<span style='font:7.0pt "Times New Roman"'>
</span></span></span><![endif]><span dir=LTR></span><span style='color:#1F497D'>2
minor typos on page 41:<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoListParagraph><span style='font-size:12.0pt'>" Midterm Review
of the review <u>of</u> the Joint Project Agreement (JPA) " <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoListParagraph>" Recommendation 2.8: Establish an<s>d</s>
additional mechanism for the community "<span style='color:#1F497D'><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoListParagraph><span style='color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoListParagraph style='text-indent:-18.0pt;mso-list:l0 level1 lfo3'><![if !supportLists]><span
style='color:#1F497D'><span style='mso-list:Ignore'>-<span style='font:7.0pt "Times New Roman"'>
</span></span></span><![endif]><span dir=LTR></span><span style='color:#1F497D'>I
was going to propose, if not a hassle, that references of WG4 be added as footnotes
.. first of all for consistency and second cause I find it confusing having interlaced
references 1,2,….. then 61, 62, … .. but just noticed that not all
references are inserted in the body of the document .. so we can either
remove references 1-5 from page 38 or if no agreement leave everything as is
for the sake of time .. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoListParagraph><span style='color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoListParagraph style='text-indent:-18.0pt;mso-list:l0 level1 lfo3'><![if !supportLists]><span
style='color:#1F497D'><span style='mso-list:Ignore'>-<span style='font:7.0pt "Times New Roman"'>
</span></span></span><![endif]><span dir=LTR></span><span style='color:#1F497D'>With
regards to the first para under WG4 recommendations, Fabio mentioned that he
will not be able to join the call so I'm afraid we might not be able to close this
discussion on the call .. I believe Chris wanted to revert to the old text and Fabio
was fine with the text only wanted to add the word 'three' to the 'review
mechanisms' to further focus the review and make sure it does not sound as if
it was the RT's mandate .. I do not think Fabio was suggesting deleting all
what has been deleted unless I misunderstood the debate .. I thought we were
converging to the following:<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoListParagraph><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:9.0pt;font-family:
"Verdana","sans-serif"'>“The ICANN Board should implement <span
style='background:yellow;mso-highlight:yellow'>(as soon as possible, but no
later than INSERT DATE)</span> Recommendation 2.7 of the 2009 Improving
Institutional Confidence Implementation Plan which calls on ICANN to seek input
from a committee of independent experts on the restructuring of the <u><span
style='color:red'>three</span></u> review mechanisms - the Independent Review
Panel (IRP), the Reconsideration Process and the Office of the Ombudsman.
This should be a broad, comprehensive assessment of the accountability and
transparency of the <u><span style='color:red'>three</span></u> existing
mechanisms, their inter-relation, if any (i.e., do the three processes provided
for a graduated appeals process) with a view towards reducing costs, issuing
timelier decisions, and covering a wider spectrum of issues in the IRP.</span><span
lang=EN-GB style='color:#1F497D'> </span><span style='color:#1F497D'>"<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoListParagraph><span style='color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoListParagraph><span style='color:#1F497D'>Chris, Fabio does the
above text capture the concerns of both of you ?<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoListParagraph><span style='color:#1F497D'>Olivier, do you mind
reverting back to the old text?<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoListParagraph><span style='color:#1F497D'>Finally, Warren, I believe
you were in favour of the old text too, right?<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoListParagraph><span style='color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoListParagraph><span style='color:#1F497D'>I know there is still
some disagreement on whether in principle the RT should further investigate the
review mechanisms but would this affect the current state of the text ? I believe
even Fabio mentioned that this would not impact the text .. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoListParagraph><span style='color:#1F497D'>Does this capture the
debate or have I overlooked other points of disagreement? <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoListParagraph><span style='color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoListParagraph><span style='color:#1F497D'>Kind Regards<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoListParagraph><span style='color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoListParagraph><span style='color:#1F497D'>--Manal <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoListParagraph><span style='color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<div style='border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm'>
<p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'>From:</span></b><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'>
at-review-bounces@icann.org [mailto:at-review-bounces@icann.org] <b>On Behalf
Of </b>Brian Cute<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Sunday, October 24, 2010 2:48 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> 'Chris Disspain'; at-review@icann.org<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [AT-Review] Version 10 - CONCERNS<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'>RT,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'>Tomorrow I will send the balance
of the document to the translation team with the WG4 section (and the WG4
references in the earlier portions of the document) removed. We have a divergence
of views on WG4 that must be resolved. I was hoping to cancel the call on
Monday but it appears we need to have that call for the unique purpose of
resolving the WG4 portion of the report. We will resolve the WG4 portion and
send it to the translation team so the document can be issued to the public as
a whole.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'>Regards,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'>Brian<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<div style='border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm'>
<p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'>From:</span></b><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'> Chris Disspain
[mailto:ceo@auda.org.au] <br>
<b>Sent:</b> Saturday, October 23, 2010 8:09 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> briancute@afilias.info; at-review@icann.org<br>
<b>Subject:</b> RE: [AT-Review] Version 10 - CONCERNS<br>
<b>Importance:</b> High<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";
color:#7030A0'>All,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";
color:#7030A0'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";
color:#7030A0'>I’m very concerned that the current amendments to the
language of the first paragraph of WG4 recommendations has been so watered down
that the recommendation is now ineffectual.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";
color:#7030A0'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";
color:#7030A0'>The current draft language is:<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";
color:#7030A0'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoPlainText><span style='font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif"'>“The
ICANN Board should (as soon as possible, but no later than INSERT DATE) seek
input from a committee of independent experts on the restructuring of the three
review mechanisms - the Independent Review Panel (IRP), the Reconsideration
Process and the Office of the Ombudsman. This should, in particular,
address the following topics: <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoPlainText><span style='font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif"'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";
color:#7030A0'>I believe that the paragraph is basically meaningless. It simply
asks the Board to seek input, and makes no reference to previous
recommendations to the Board which have not been followed. Further, the removal
of the references to the sort of review it should be (broad, comprehensive etc)
means that at no point in the recommendation as a whole is anything specific
said about the IRP. The sub-points to the recommendation provide specific input
re Ombudsman and reconsideration but nothing on IRP. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";
color:#7030A0'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";
color:#7030A0'>The previous language was:<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";
color:#7030A0'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif"'>“The
ICANN Board should implement <span style='background:yellow;mso-highlight:yellow'>(as
soon as possible, but no later than INSERT DATE)</span> Recommendation 2.7 of
the 2009 Improving Institutional Confidence Implementation Plan which calls on
ICANN to seek input from a committee of independent experts on the
restructuring of the review mechanisms - the Independent Review Panel (IRP),
the Reconsideration Process and the Office of the Ombudsman. This should
be a broad, comprehensive assessment of the accountability and transparency of
the existing mechanisms, their inter-relation, if any (i.e., do the three
processes provided for a graduated appeals process) with a view towards
reducing costs, issuing timelier decisions, and covering a wider spectrum of
issues in the IRP. <span style='background:lime;mso-highlight:lime'>The
utility of the Community Re-Vote and Board removal mechanisms should be
assessed and appropriate action taken. Were these issues adequately
discussed to include them?</span>”<span style='color:#7030A0'><o:p></o:p></span></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";
color:#7030A0'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<p class=MsoListParagraph style='text-indent:-18.0pt;mso-list:l1 level1 lfo2'><![if !supportLists]><span
lang=EN-GB style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";
color:#7030A0'><span style='mso-list:Ignore'>1.<span style='font:7.0pt "Times New Roman"'>
</span></span></span><![endif]><span dir=LTR></span><span lang=EN-GB
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";color:#7030A0'>I
have no issue with the removal of the community re-vote and Boars removal
mechanisms sentence.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoListParagraph style='text-indent:-18.0pt;mso-list:l1 level1 lfo2'><![if !supportLists]><span
lang=EN-GB style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";
color:#7030A0'><span style='mso-list:Ignore'>2.<span style='font:7.0pt "Times New Roman"'>
</span></span></span><![endif]><span dir=LTR></span><span lang=EN-GB
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";color:#7030A0'>I
believe that it is the ATRT’s role to review what the Board is doing re
accountability and transparency and that on this basis it is completely within
our mandate to recommend that the Board carry out something that has already
been recommended. We have done this several times in the report. We have
recommended they follow the previous recommendation and pay directors. We have
recommended that they follow the recommendations of the Board and Nom Com
reviews. I do not understand why there is a problem recommending they follow
the recommendations of the PSC.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoListParagraph style='text-indent:-18.0pt;mso-list:l1 level1 lfo2'><![if !supportLists]><span
lang=EN-GB style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";
color:#7030A0'><span style='mso-list:Ignore'>3.<span style='font:7.0pt "Times New Roman"'>
</span></span></span><![endif]><span dir=LTR></span><span lang=EN-GB
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";color:#7030A0'>The
additional part of the paragraph is critical, in my view, if this
recommendation is going to have any credibility. We have discussed at length
the issues that we have received feedback on in our public comment process and
in interviews. This is neatly encapsulated in the second sentence of the
previous language. Also the second sentence provides clear direction to the
Board on how comprehensive the assessment should be etc. This is also critical.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";
color:#7030A0'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";
color:#7030A0'>Fabio’s comment:<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";
color:#7030A0'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoPlainText><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif"'>“The
first recommendation of section 4 does not look like a recommendation at
all. It calls on somebody else to do the job that, I am sure, the Community
expected us to do. We have 101 reasons for being unable to make a
substantial recommendation at this moment, but it is necessary to give at least
a word of explanation. Otherwise we could be seriously
criticised. As a minimum, in the sixth line, instead of
"of the existing mechanisms" we should be saying "of the
existing three mechanisms" (plus the "Community re-vote", if we
want to add it). Otherwise the current text looks very much like our own
mandate.”<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";
color:#7030A0'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";
color:#7030A0'>I do not agree with this. It is NOT the ATRT’s job to
review the IRP or the Ombudsman function. It is the ATRT’s job to review
the performance under the AoC. Therefore it is perfectly acceptable for us to
recommend that the Board follow the recommendations of a previous review (by
the PSC) even if that recommendation is itself that there should be a review. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";
color:#7030A0'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";
color:#7030A0'>I consider that the previous language is far more of a
substantial recommendation that the current language.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";
color:#7030A0'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";
color:#7030A0'>I consider that the current language will lead to us being
seriously criticised. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";
color:#7030A0'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";
color:#7030A0'>I have in my diary that we have a conference call set for 11.00
UTC on Monday. If that’s correct perhaps we can use that to debate this
issue if need be.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";
color:#7030A0'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";
color:#7030A0'>Cheers, <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";
color:#7030A0'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";
color:#7030A0'>Chris Disspain </span><span lang=EN-AU style='font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";color:#FF8000'>|</span><span lang=EN-AU
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";color:black'> </span><span
lang=EN-AU style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";
color:#7030A0'>Chief Executive Officer</span><span lang=EN-AU style='font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-AU style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";
color:#7030A0'>.au Domain Administration Ltd</span><span lang=EN-AU
style='color:#7030A0'><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-AU style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";
color:#7030A0'><a href="tel:1300%20732%20929"><span style='color:#7030A0;
text-decoration:none'>T: 1300 732 929</span></a></span><span lang=EN-AU
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";color:black'> </span><span
lang=EN-AU style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";
color:#FF8000'>|</span><span lang=EN-AU style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:
"Verdana","sans-serif";color:black'> </span><span lang=EN-AU
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";color:#7030A0'><a
href="tel:03%208341%204112"><span style='color:#7030A0;text-decoration:none'>F:
03 8341 4112</span></a></span><span lang=EN-AU style='color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-AU style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";
color:#7030A0'>E: <a href="mailto:ceo@auda.org.au">ceo@auda.org.au</a></span><span
lang=EN-AU style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";
color:black'> </span><span lang=EN-AU style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:
"Verdana","sans-serif";color:#FF9900'>|</span><span lang=EN-AU
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";color:black'> </span><span
lang=EN-AU style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";
color:#7030A0'>W:</span><span lang=EN-AU style='color:blue'><a
href="http://www.auda.org.au/" target="_blank" title="http://www.auda.org.au"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif"'>www.auda.org.au</span></a><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-AU style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";
color:black'> </span><span lang=EN-AU style='color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-AU style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";
color:#7030A0'>auDA - The Australian Domain Name Administrator</span><span
lang=EN-AU style='color:#7030A0'><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-AU style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";
color:black'> </span><span lang=EN-AU style='color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";
color:#7030A0'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><b><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:8.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";
color:#FF9900'>Important Notice</span></b><b><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:
7.5pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";color:#7030A0'> - </span></b><span
lang=EN-GB style='font-size:7.5pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";
color:#7030A0'>This email may contain information which is confidential and/or
subject to legal privilege, and is intended for the use of the named addressee only.
If you are not the intended recipient, you must not use, disclose or copy any
part of this email. If you have received this email by mistake, please notify
the sender and delete this message immediately. Please consider the environment
before printing this email.</span><span lang=EN-AU style='color:#7030A0'><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";
color:#7030A0'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div style='border:none;border-left:solid blue 1.5pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 4.0pt'>
<div>
<div style='border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm'>
<p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'>From:</span></b><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'>
at-review-bounces@icann.org [mailto:at-review-bounces@icann.org] <b>On Behalf
Of </b>Brian Cute<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Sunday, 24 October 2010 04:26<br>
<b>To:</b> at-review@icann.org<br>
<b>Subject:</b> [AT-Review] Version 10<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-GB><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal>RT,<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal>Attached is the next version. The following version
will be our final version that is sent to the translation team. If we do
not reach agreement on WG4, I will sent the balance of the document to the
translation team to begin that process while we finalize WG4.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal>Edits in this version include: Warren’s edits
from his email yesterday and Olivier’s edits from today. My view of
WG4: we have represented that there is a divergence of opinion on the
ATRT regarding the issue of a binding appeals mechanism. Olivier’s
proposed edits are designed to address the concern that we are asking ICANN to
undertake a review when the ATRT should be doing a review and offering firm
recommendations. I have added some language in the Findings section of
WG4 that explains the ATRT view of the incomplete IIC work.
Olivier’s language narrows the WG4 recommendations to the specific issues
that have been identified by the ATRT with respect to the 3 appeals
mechanisms. I believe this is a balance approach to address the divergent
views of the Review Team and a way to make recommendations that call for
concrete action as opposed to an open review.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal>At this point, the document needs to go forward if we are to
respect our intention to have the comment period close prior to
Cartagena. <o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal>Please submit your final view on the proposed
language. If there is serious dissent, dissenting opinions will have to
be drafted.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal>Regards,<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal>Brian<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif"'><br>
<br>
__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature
database 5558 (20101023) __________<br>
<br>
The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.<br>
<br>
<a href="http://www.eset.com">http://www.eset.com</a><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif"'><br>
<br>
__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature
database 5558 (20101023) __________<br>
<br>
The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.<br>
<br>
<a href="http://www.eset.com">http://www.eset.com</a><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</body>
</html>