<html><body><span style="font-family:Verdana; color:#000000; font-size:10pt;"><div>Manal</div><div>Yes that is correct.</div><div><br></div><div>Warren<br><br>Warren Adelman<br>President & COO<br><a href="http://GoDaddy.com">GoDaddy.com</a><br><a href="mailto:warren@godaddy.com">warren@godaddy.com</a><br></div><div>twitter: <a href="http://twitter.com/asocialcontract">http://twitter.com/asocialcontract</a><br><a href="http://www.godaddy.com">http://www.godaddy.com</a></div><div><br><br></div>
<blockquote id="replyBlockquote" webmail="1" style="border-left: 2px solid blue; margin-left: 8px; padding-left: 8px; font-size:10pt; color:black; font-family:verdana;">
<div id="wmQuoteWrapper">
-------- Original Message --------<br>
Subject: Re: [AT-Review] Version 10 - CONCERNS<br>
From: "Manal Ismail" <<a href="mailto:manal@tra.gov.eg">manal@tra.gov.eg</a>><br>
Date: Sun, October 24, 2010 6:09 am<br>
To: <<a href="mailto:briancute@afilias.info">briancute@afilias.info</a>>, "Chris Disspain" <<a href="mailto:ceo@auda.org.au">ceo@auda.org.au</a>>, <br>
<<a href="mailto:at-review@icann.org">at-review@icann.org</a>><br>
<br>
<style>
#wmQuoteWrapper /* Font Definitions */ @font-face {font-family:Wingdings; panose-1:5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0;}
#wmQuoteWrapper @font-face {font-family:Wingdings; panose-1:5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0;}
#wmQuoteWrapper @font-face {font-family:Calibri; panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
#wmQuoteWrapper @font-face {font-family:Tahoma; panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
#wmQuoteWrapper @font-face {font-family:Consolas; panose-1:2 11 6 9 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
#wmQuoteWrapper @font-face {font-family:Verdana; panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
#wmQuoteWrapper /* Style Definitions */ p.MsoNormal, #wmQuoteWrapper li.MsoNormal, #wmQuoteWrapper div.MsoNormal {margin:0cm; margin-bottom:.0001pt; font-size:11.0pt; font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";}
#wmQuoteWrapper a:link, #wmQuoteWrapper span.MsoHyperlink {mso-style-priority:99; color:blue; text-decoration:underline;}
#wmQuoteWrapper a:visited, #wmQuoteWrapper span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed {mso-style-priority:99; color:purple; text-decoration:underline;}
#wmQuoteWrapper p.MsoPlainText, #wmQuoteWrapper li.MsoPlainText, #wmQuoteWrapper div.MsoPlainText {mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-link:"Plain Text Char"; margin:0cm; margin-bottom:.0001pt; font-size:10.5pt; font-family:Consolas;}
#wmQuoteWrapper p.MsoListParagraph, #wmQuoteWrapper li.MsoListParagraph, #wmQuoteWrapper div.MsoListParagraph {mso-style-priority:34; margin-top:0cm; margin-right:0cm; margin-bottom:0cm; margin-left:36.0pt; margin-bottom:.0001pt; font-size:11.0pt; font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";}
#wmQuoteWrapper span.PlainTextChar {mso-style-name:"Plain Text Char"; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-link:"Plain Text"; font-family:Consolas;}
#wmQuoteWrapper span.EmailStyle20 {mso-style-type:personal; font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"; color:windowtext;}
#wmQuoteWrapper span.EmailStyle21 {mso-style-type:personal; font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif"; color:#7030A0;}
#wmQuoteWrapper span.EmailStyle22 {mso-style-type:personal; font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"; color:#1F497D;}
#wmQuoteWrapper span.EmailStyle23 {mso-style-type:personal-reply; font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"; color:#1F497D;}
#wmQuoteWrapper .MsoChpDefault {mso-style-type:export-only; font-size:10.0pt;}
#wmQuoteWrapper @page WordSection1 {size:612.0pt 792.0pt; margin:72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt;}
#wmQuoteWrapper div.WordSection1 {page:WordSection1;}
#wmQuoteWrapper /* List Definitions */ @list l0 {mso-list-id:143396199; mso-list-type:hybrid; mso-list-template-ids:392318630 1350221362 67698691 67698693 67698689 67698691 67698693 67698689 67698691 67698693;}
#wmQuoteWrapper @list l0:level1 {mso-level-start-at:2; mso-level-number-format:bullet; mso-level-text:-; mso-level-tab-stop:none; mso-level-number-position:left; text-indent:-18.0pt; font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"; mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri; mso-bidi-font-family:Arial;}
#wmQuoteWrapper @list l1 {mso-list-id:1481926712; mso-list-type:hybrid; mso-list-template-ids:1890762400 134807567 134807577 134807579 134807567 134807577 134807579 134807567 134807577 134807579;}
#wmQuoteWrapper @list l1:level1 {mso-level-tab-stop:none; mso-level-number-position:left; text-indent:-18.0pt;}
#wmQuoteWrapper @list l1:level2 {mso-level-tab-stop:72.0pt; mso-level-number-position:left; text-indent:-18.0pt;}
#wmQuoteWrapper @list l1:level3 {mso-level-tab-stop:108.0pt; mso-level-number-position:left; text-indent:-18.0pt;}
#wmQuoteWrapper @list l1:level4 {mso-level-tab-stop:144.0pt; mso-level-number-position:left; text-indent:-18.0pt;}
#wmQuoteWrapper @list l1:level5 {mso-level-tab-stop:180.0pt; mso-level-number-position:left; text-indent:-18.0pt;}
#wmQuoteWrapper @list l1:level6 {mso-level-tab-stop:216.0pt; mso-level-number-position:left; text-indent:-18.0pt;}
#wmQuoteWrapper @list l1:level7 {mso-level-tab-stop:252.0pt; mso-level-number-position:left; text-indent:-18.0pt;}
#wmQuoteWrapper @list l1:level8 {mso-level-tab-stop:288.0pt; mso-level-number-position:left; text-indent:-18.0pt;}
#wmQuoteWrapper @list l1:level9 {mso-level-tab-stop:324.0pt; mso-level-number-position:left; text-indent:-18.0pt;}
#wmQuoteWrapper ol {margin-bottom:0cm;}
#wmQuoteWrapper ul {margin-bottom:0cm;}
</style> <div class="WordSection1"> <div class="MsoNormal" style="font-size:12pt;"><span style="color:#1F497D">Thanks Brian ..<o:p></o:p></span></div> <div class="MsoNormal" style="font-size:12pt;"><span style="color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></div> <div class="MsoNormal" style="font-size:12pt;"><span style="color:#1F497D">A few remarks on version 10:<o:p></o:p></span></div> <div class="MsoNormal" style="font-size:12pt;"><span style="color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></div> <div class="MsoListParagraph" style="text-indent:-18.0pt;mso-list:l0 level1 lfo3"><span style="color:#1F497D"><span style="mso-list:Ignore">-<span style="font:7.0pt "Times New Roman""> </span></span></span><span dir="LTR"></span><span style="color:#1F497D">2 minor typos on page 41:<o:p></o:p></span></div> <div class="MsoListParagraph"><span style="font-size:12.0pt">" Midterm Review of the review <u>of</u> the Joint Project Agreement (JPA) " <o:p></o:p></span></div> <div class="MsoListParagraph">" Recommendation 2.8: Establish an<s>d</s> additional mechanism for the community "<span style="color:#1F497D"><o:p></o:p></span></div> <div class="MsoListParagraph"><span style="color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></div> <div class="MsoListParagraph" style="text-indent:-18.0pt;mso-list:l0 level1 lfo3"><span style="color:#1F497D"><span style="mso-list:Ignore">-<span style="font:7.0pt "Times New Roman""> </span></span></span><span dir="LTR"></span><span style="color:#1F497D">I was going to propose, if not a hassle, that references of WG4 be added as footnotes .. first of all for consistency and second cause I find it confusing having interlaced references 1,2,….. then 61, 62, … .. but just noticed that not all references are inserted in the body of the document .. so we can either remove references 1-5 from page 38 or if no agreement leave everything as is for the sake of time .. <o:p></o:p></span></div> <div class="MsoListParagraph"><span style="color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></div> <div class="MsoListParagraph" style="text-indent:-18.0pt;mso-list:l0 level1 lfo3"><span style="color:#1F497D"><span style="mso-list:Ignore">-<span style="font:7.0pt "Times New Roman""> </span></span></span><span dir="LTR"></span><span style="color:#1F497D">With regards to the first para under WG4 recommendations, Fabio mentioned that he will not be able to join the call so I'm afraid we might not be able to close this discussion on the call .. I believe Chris wanted to revert to the old text and Fabio was fine with the text only wanted to add the word 'three' to the 'review mechanisms' to further focus the review and make sure it does not sound as if it was the RT's mandate .. I do not think Fabio was suggesting deleting all what has been deleted unless I misunderstood the debate .. I thought we were converging to the following:<o:p></o:p></span></div> <div class="MsoListParagraph"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"">“The ICANN Board should implement <span style="background:yellow;mso-highlight:yellow">(as soon as possible, but no later than INSERT DATE)</span> Recommendation 2.7 of the 2009 Improving Institutional Confidence Implementation Plan which calls on ICANN to seek input from a committee of independent experts on the restructuring of the <u><span style="color:red">three</span></u> review mechanisms - the Independent Review Panel (IRP), the Reconsideration Process and the Office of the Ombudsman. This should be a broad, comprehensive assessment of the accountability and transparency of the <u><span style="color:red">three</span></u> existing mechanisms, their inter-relation, if any (i.e., do the three processes provided for a graduated appeals process) with a view towards reducing costs, issuing timelier decisions, and covering a wider spectrum of issues in the IRP.</span><span lang="EN-GB" style="color:#1F497D"> </span><span style="color:#1F497D">"<o:p></o:p></span></div> <div class="MsoListParagraph"><span style="color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></div> <div class="MsoListParagraph"><span style="color:#1F497D">Chris, Fabio does the above text capture the concerns of both of you ?<o:p></o:p></span></div> <div class="MsoListParagraph"><span style="color:#1F497D">Olivier, do you mind reverting back to the old text?<o:p></o:p></span></div> <div class="MsoListParagraph"><span style="color:#1F497D">Finally, Warren, I believe you were in favour of the old text too, right?<o:p></o:p></span></div> <div class="MsoListParagraph"><span style="color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></div> <div class="MsoListParagraph"><span style="color:#1F497D">I know there is still some disagreement on whether in principle the RT should further investigate the review mechanisms but would this affect the current state of the text ? I believe even Fabio mentioned that this would not impact the text .. <o:p></o:p></span></div> <div class="MsoListParagraph"><span style="color:#1F497D">Does this capture the debate or have I overlooked other points of disagreement? <o:p></o:p></span></div> <div class="MsoListParagraph"><span style="color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></div> <div class="MsoListParagraph"><span style="color:#1F497D">Kind Regards<o:p></o:p></span></div> <div class="MsoListParagraph"><span style="color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></div> <div class="MsoListParagraph"><span style="color:#1F497D">--Manal <o:p></o:p></span></div> <div class="MsoListParagraph"><span style="color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></div> <div class="MsoNormal" style="font-size:12pt;"><span style="color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></div> <div> <div style="border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm"> <div class="MsoNormal" style="font-size:12pt;"><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif""> <a href="mailto:at-review-bounces@icann.org">at-review-bounces@icann.org</a> [<a href="mailto:at-review-bounces@icann.org">mailto:at-review-bounces@icann.org</a>] <b>On Behalf Of </b>Brian Cute<br> <b>Sent:</b> Sunday, October 24, 2010 2:48 PM<br> <b>To:</b> 'Chris Disspain'; <a href="mailto:at-review@icann.org">at-review@icann.org</a><br> <b>Subject:</b> Re: [AT-Review] Version 10 - CONCERNS<o:p></o:p></span></div> </div> </div> <div class="MsoNormal" style="font-size:12pt;"><o:p> </o:p></div> <div class="MsoNormal" style="font-size:12pt;"><span style="color:#1F497D">RT,<o:p></o:p></span></div> <div class="MsoNormal" style="font-size:12pt;"><span style="color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></div> <div class="MsoNormal" style="font-size:12pt;"><span style="color:#1F497D">Tomorrow I will send the balance of the document to the translation team with the WG4 section (and the WG4 references in the earlier portions of the document) removed. We have a divergence of views on WG4 that must be resolved. I was hoping to cancel the call on Monday but it appears we need to have that call for the unique purpose of resolving the WG4 portion of the report. We will resolve the WG4 portion and send it to the translation team so the document can be issued to the public as a whole.<o:p></o:p></span></div> <div class="MsoNormal" style="font-size:12pt;"><span style="color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></div> <div class="MsoNormal" style="font-size:12pt;"><span style="color:#1F497D">Regards,<o:p></o:p></span></div> <div class="MsoNormal" style="font-size:12pt;"><span style="color:#1F497D">Brian<o:p></o:p></span></div> <div class="MsoNormal" style="font-size:12pt;"><span style="color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></div> <div> <div style="border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm"> <div class="MsoNormal" style="font-size:12pt;"><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif""> Chris Disspain [<a href="mailto:ceo@auda.org.au">mailto:ceo@auda.org.au</a>] <br> <b>Sent:</b> Saturday, October 23, 2010 8:09 PM<br> <b>To:</b> <a href="mailto:briancute@afilias.info">briancute@afilias.info</a>; <a href="mailto:at-review@icann.org">at-review@icann.org</a><br> <b>Subject:</b> RE: [AT-Review] Version 10 - CONCERNS<br> <b>Importance:</b> High<o:p></o:p></span></div> </div> </div> <div class="MsoNormal" style="font-size:12pt;"><o:p> </o:p></div> <div class="MsoNormal" style="font-size:12pt;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif"; color:#7030A0">All,<o:p></o:p></span></div> <div class="MsoNormal" style="font-size:12pt;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif"; color:#7030A0"><o:p> </o:p></span></div> <div class="MsoNormal" style="font-size:12pt;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif"; color:#7030A0">I’m very concerned that the current amendments to the language of the first paragraph of WG4 recommendations has been so watered down that the recommendation is now ineffectual.<o:p></o:p></span></div> <div class="MsoNormal" style="font-size:12pt;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif"; color:#7030A0"><o:p> </o:p></span></div> <div class="MsoNormal" style="font-size:12pt;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif"; color:#7030A0">The current draft language is:<o:p></o:p></span></div> <div class="MsoNormal" style="font-size:12pt;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif"; color:#7030A0"><o:p> </o:p></span></div> <div class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif"">“The ICANN Board should (as soon as possible, but no later than INSERT DATE) seek input from a committee of independent experts on the restructuring of the three review mechanisms - the Independent Review Panel (IRP), the Reconsideration Process and the Office of the Ombudsman. This should, in particular, address the following topics: <o:p></o:p></span></div> <div class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif""><o:p> </o:p></span></div> <div class="MsoNormal" style="font-size:12pt;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif"; color:#7030A0">I believe that the paragraph is basically meaningless. It simply asks the Board to seek input, and makes no reference to previous recommendations to the Board which have not been followed. Further, the removal of the references to the sort of review it should be (broad, comprehensive etc) means that at no point in the recommendation as a whole is anything specific said about the IRP. The sub-points to the recommendation provide specific input re Ombudsman and reconsideration but nothing on IRP. <o:p></o:p></span></div> <div class="MsoNormal" style="font-size:12pt;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif"; color:#7030A0"><o:p> </o:p></span></div> <div class="MsoNormal" style="font-size:12pt;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif"; color:#7030A0">The previous language was:<o:p></o:p></span></div> <div class="MsoNormal" style="font-size:12pt;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif"; color:#7030A0"><o:p> </o:p></span></div> <div class="MsoNormal" style="font-size:12pt;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif"">“The ICANN Board should implement <span style="background:yellow;mso-highlight:yellow">(as soon as possible, but no later than INSERT DATE)</span> Recommendation 2.7 of the 2009 Improving Institutional Confidence Implementation Plan which calls on ICANN to seek input from a committee of independent experts on the restructuring of the review mechanisms - the Independent Review Panel (IRP), the Reconsideration Process and the Office of the Ombudsman. This should be a broad, comprehensive assessment of the accountability and transparency of the existing mechanisms, their inter-relation, if any (i.e., do the three processes provided for a graduated appeals process) with a view towards reducing costs, issuing timelier decisions, and covering a wider spectrum of issues in the IRP. <span style="background:lime;mso-highlight:lime">The utility of the Community Re-Vote and Board removal mechanisms should be assessed and appropriate action taken. Were these issues adequately discussed to include them?</span>”<span style="color:#7030A0"><o:p></o:p></span></span></div> <div class="MsoNormal" style="font-size:12pt;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif"; color:#7030A0"><o:p> </o:p></span></div> <div> <div class="MsoListParagraph" style="text-indent:-18.0pt;mso-list:l1 level1 lfo2"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif"; color:#7030A0"><span style="mso-list:Ignore">1.<span style="font:7.0pt "Times New Roman""> </span></span></span><span dir="LTR"></span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";color:#7030A0">I have no issue with the removal of the community re-vote and Boars removal mechanisms sentence.<o:p></o:p></span></div> <div class="MsoListParagraph" style="text-indent:-18.0pt;mso-list:l1 level1 lfo2"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif"; color:#7030A0"><span style="mso-list:Ignore">2.<span style="font:7.0pt "Times New Roman""> </span></span></span><span dir="LTR"></span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";color:#7030A0">I believe that it is the ATRT’s role to review what the Board is doing re accountability and transparency and that on this basis it is completely within our mandate to recommend that the Board carry out something that has already been recommended. We have done this several times in the report. We have recommended they follow the previous recommendation and pay directors. We have recommended that they follow the recommendations of the Board and Nom Com reviews. I do not understand why there is a problem recommending they follow the recommendations of the PSC.<o:p></o:p></span></div> <div class="MsoListParagraph" style="text-indent:-18.0pt;mso-list:l1 level1 lfo2"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif"; color:#7030A0"><span style="mso-list:Ignore">3.<span style="font:7.0pt "Times New Roman""> </span></span></span><span dir="LTR"></span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";color:#7030A0">The additional part of the paragraph is critical, in my view, if this recommendation is going to have any credibility. We have discussed at length the issues that we have received feedback on in our public comment process and in interviews. This is neatly encapsulated in the second sentence of the previous language. Also the second sentence provides clear direction to the Board on how comprehensive the assessment should be etc. This is also critical.<o:p></o:p></span></div> <div class="MsoNormal" style="font-size:12pt;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif"; color:#7030A0"><o:p> </o:p></span></div> <div class="MsoNormal" style="font-size:12pt;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif"; color:#7030A0">Fabio’s comment:<o:p></o:p></span></div> <div class="MsoNormal" style="font-size:12pt;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif"; color:#7030A0"><o:p> </o:p></span></div> <div class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif"">“The first recommendation of section 4 does not look like a recommendation at all. It calls on somebody else to do the job that, I am sure, the Community expected us to do. We have 101 reasons for being unable to make a substantial recommendation at this moment, but it is necessary to give at least a word of explanation. Otherwise we could be seriously criticised. As a minimum, in the sixth line, instead of "of the existing mechanisms" we should be saying "of the existing three mechanisms" (plus the "Community re-vote", if we want to add it). Otherwise the current text looks very much like our own mandate.”<o:p></o:p></span></div> <div class="MsoNormal" style="font-size:12pt;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif"; color:#7030A0"><o:p> </o:p></span></div> <div class="MsoNormal" style="font-size:12pt;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif"; color:#7030A0">I do not agree with this. It is NOT the ATRT’s job to review the IRP or the Ombudsman function. It is the ATRT’s job to review the performance under the AoC. Therefore it is perfectly acceptable for us to recommend that the Board follow the recommendations of a previous review (by the PSC) even if that recommendation is itself that there should be a review. <o:p></o:p></span></div> <div class="MsoNormal" style="font-size:12pt;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif"; color:#7030A0"><o:p> </o:p></span></div> <div class="MsoNormal" style="font-size:12pt;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif"; color:#7030A0">I consider that the previous language is far more of a substantial recommendation that the current language.<o:p></o:p></span></div> <div class="MsoNormal" style="font-size:12pt;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif"; color:#7030A0"><o:p> </o:p></span></div> <div class="MsoNormal" style="font-size:12pt;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif"; color:#7030A0">I consider that the current language will lead to us being seriously criticised. <o:p></o:p></span></div> <div class="MsoNormal" style="font-size:12pt;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif"; color:#7030A0"><o:p> </o:p></span></div> <div class="MsoNormal" style="font-size:12pt;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif"; color:#7030A0">I have in my diary that we have a conference call set for 11.00 UTC on Monday. If that’s correct perhaps we can use that to debate this issue if need be.<o:p></o:p></span></div> <div class="MsoNormal" style="font-size:12pt;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif"; color:#7030A0"><o:p> </o:p></span></div> <div class="MsoNormal" style="font-size:12pt;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif"; color:#7030A0">Cheers, <o:p></o:p></span></div> <div class="MsoNormal" style="font-size:12pt;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif"; color:#7030A0"><o:p> </o:p></span></div> <div class="MsoNormal" style="font-size:12pt;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif"; color:#7030A0">Chris Disspain </span><span lang="EN-AU" style="font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";color:#FF8000">|</span><span lang="EN-AU" style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";color:black"> </span><span lang="EN-AU" style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif"; color:#7030A0">Chief Executive Officer</span><span lang="EN-AU" style="font-size: 10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></div> <div class="MsoNormal" style="font-size:12pt;"><span lang="EN-AU" style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif"; color:#7030A0">.au Domain Administration Ltd</span><span lang="EN-AU" style="color:#7030A0"><o:p></o:p></span></div> <div class="MsoNormal" style="font-size:12pt;"><span lang="EN-AU" style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif"; color:#7030A0"><a target="_blank" href="tel:1300%20732%20929"><span style="color:#7030A0; text-decoration:none">T: 1300 732 929</span></a></span><span lang="EN-AU" style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";color:black"> </span><span lang="EN-AU" style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif"; color:#FF8000">|</span><span lang="EN-AU" style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif";color:black"> </span><span lang="EN-AU" style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";color:#7030A0"><a target="_blank" href="tel:03%208341%204112"><span style="color:#7030A0;text-decoration:none">F: 03 8341 4112</span></a></span><span lang="EN-AU" style="color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></div> <div class="MsoNormal" style="font-size:12pt;"><span lang="EN-AU" style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif"; color:#7030A0">E: <a target="_blank" href="mailto:ceo@auda.org.au">ceo@auda.org.au</a></span><span lang="EN-AU" style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif"; color:black"> </span><span lang="EN-AU" style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif";color:#FF9900">|</span><span lang="EN-AU" style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";color:black"> </span><span lang="EN-AU" style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif"; color:#7030A0">W:</span><span lang="EN-AU" style="color:blue"><a href="http://www.auda.org.au/" target="_blank" title="http://www.auda.org.au"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif"">www.auda.org.au</span></a><o:p></o:p></span></div> <div class="MsoNormal" style="font-size:12pt;"><span lang="EN-AU" style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif"; color:black"> </span><span lang="EN-AU" style="color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></div> <div class="MsoNormal" style="font-size:12pt;"><span lang="EN-AU" style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif"; color:#7030A0">auDA - The Australian Domain Name Administrator</span><span lang="EN-AU" style="color:#7030A0"><o:p></o:p></span></div> <div class="MsoNormal" style="font-size:12pt;"><span lang="EN-AU" style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif"; color:black"> </span><span lang="EN-AU" style="color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></div> <div class="MsoNormal" style="font-size:12pt;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif"; color:#7030A0"><o:p> </o:p></span></div> <div class="MsoNormal" style="font-size:12pt;"><b><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:8.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif"; color:#FF9900">Important Notice</span></b><b><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 7.5pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";color:#7030A0"> - </span></b><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:7.5pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif"; color:#7030A0">This email may contain information which is confidential and/or subject to legal privilege, and is intended for the use of the named addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not use, disclose or copy any part of this email. If you have received this email by mistake, please notify the sender and delete this message immediately. Please consider the environment before printing this email.</span><span lang="EN-AU" style="color:#7030A0"><o:p></o:p></span></div> </div> <div class="MsoNormal" style="font-size:12pt;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif"; color:#7030A0"><o:p> </o:p></span></div> <div style="border:none;border-left:solid blue 1.5pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 4.0pt"> <div> <div style="border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm"> <div class="MsoNormal" style="font-size:12pt;"><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif""> <a href="mailto:at-review-bounces@icann.org">at-review-bounces@icann.org</a> [<a href="mailto:at-review-bounces@icann.org">mailto:at-review-bounces@icann.org</a>] <b>On Behalf Of </b>Brian Cute<br> <b>Sent:</b> Sunday, 24 October 2010 04:26<br> <b>To:</b> <a href="mailto:at-review@icann.org">at-review@icann.org</a><br> <b>Subject:</b> [AT-Review] Version 10<o:p></o:p></span></div> </div> </div> <div class="MsoNormal" style="font-size:12pt;"><span lang="EN-GB"><o:p> </o:p></span></div> <div class="MsoNormal" style="font-size:12pt;">RT,<o:p></o:p></div> <div class="MsoNormal" style="font-size:12pt;"><o:p> </o:p></div> <div class="MsoNormal" style="font-size:12pt;">Attached is the next version. The following version will be our final version that is sent to the translation team. If we do not reach agreement on WG4, I will sent the balance of the document to the translation team to begin that process while we finalize WG4.<o:p></o:p></div> <div class="MsoNormal" style="font-size:12pt;"><o:p> </o:p></div> <div class="MsoNormal" style="font-size:12pt;">Edits in this version include: Warren’s edits from his email yesterday and Olivier’s edits from today. My view of WG4: we have represented that there is a divergence of opinion on the ATRT regarding the issue of a binding appeals mechanism. Olivier’s proposed edits are designed to address the concern that we are asking ICANN to undertake a review when the ATRT should be doing a review and offering firm recommendations. I have added some language in the Findings section of WG4 that explains the ATRT view of the incomplete IIC work. Olivier’s language narrows the WG4 recommendations to the specific issues that have been identified by the ATRT with respect to the 3 appeals mechanisms. I believe this is a balance approach to address the divergent views of the Review Team and a way to make recommendations that call for concrete action as opposed to an open review.<o:p></o:p></div> <div class="MsoNormal" style="font-size:12pt;"><o:p> </o:p></div> <div class="MsoNormal" style="font-size:12pt;">At this point, the document needs to go forward if we are to respect our intention to have the comment period close prior to Cartagena. <o:p></o:p></div> <div class="MsoNormal" style="font-size:12pt;"><o:p> </o:p></div> <div class="MsoNormal" style="font-size:12pt;">Please submit your final view on the proposed language. If there is serious dissent, dissenting opinions will have to be drafted.<o:p></o:p></div> <div class="MsoNormal" style="font-size:12pt;"><o:p> </o:p></div> <div class="MsoNormal" style="font-size:12pt;">Regards,<o:p></o:p></div> <div class="MsoNormal" style="font-size:12pt;">Brian<o:p></o:p></div> <div class="MsoNormal" style="font-size:12pt;"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif""><br> <br> __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 5558 (20101023) __________<br> <br> The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.<br> <br> <a target="_blank" href="http://www.eset.com">http://www.eset.com</a><o:p></o:p></span></div> </div> <div class="MsoNormal" style="font-size:12pt;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif""><br> <br> __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 5558 (20101023) __________<br> <br> The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.<br> <br> <a target="_blank" href="http://www.eset.com">http://www.eset.com</a><o:p></o:p></span></div> </div> <hr>_______________________________________________<br>
AT-Review mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:AT-Review@icann.org">AT-Review@icann.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-review">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-review</a><br>
</div>
</blockquote></span></body></html>