Dear RT:<br><br>Just a quick suggestion based on a conversation with the Brazilian representative at the GAC. <br><br>Recommendation n.11 of our report says that "Board needs to exercise more discipline in asking for GAC <span style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 102);">advice on public policy issues</span>".<br>
<br>The AoC has a different wording for that, as provided by item 9.1, (b): <br><br>9.1 Ensuring accountability, transparency and the interests of global Internet users: ICANN commits to maintain and improve robust mechanisms for public input, accountability, and transparency so as to ensure that the outcomes of its decision-making will reflect the public interest and be accountable to all stakeholders by: <br>
(...)<br>(b) assessing the role and effectiveness of the GAC and its interaction with the Board and making recommendations for improvement to ensure effective consideration by ICANN of GAC input on the <span style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 102);">public policy aspects of the technical coordination of the DNS</span>;<br>
<br>I know that it may lead to whole debate on the range of issues that can trigger the advice procedure, but I would like just to point that out in the light of the AoC wording.<br><br>Btw, sorry for missing the dinner last night. I had a conference call that lasted longer than expected. <br>
<br>Best,<br>Carlos <br><br><br>2010/12/7 Chris Disspain <<a href="mailto:ceo@auda.org.au">ceo@auda.org.au</a>>:<br>> All,<br>><br>> <br>><br>> Suggested redrafts of a number of recommendations are attached.<br>
><br>> <br>><br>> Cheers,<br>><br>> <br>><br>> Chris Disspain | Chief Executive Officer<br>><br>> .au Domain Administration Ltd<br>><br>> T: 1300 732 929 | F: 03 8341 4112<br>><br>
> E: <a href="mailto:ceo@auda.org.au">ceo@auda.org.au</a> | W:<a href="http://www.auda.org.au">www.auda.org.au</a><br>><br>> <br>><br>> auDA - The Australian Domain Name Administrator<br>><br>> <br>
><br>> <br>><br>> Important Notice - This email may contain information which is confidential<br>> and/or subject to legal privilege, and is intended for the use of the named<br>> addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not use,<br>
> disclose or copy any part of this email. If you have received this email by<br>> mistake, please notify the sender and delete this message immediately.<br>> Please consider the environment before printing this email.<br>
><br>> <br>><br>> From: <a href="mailto:at-review-bounces@icann.org">at-review-bounces@icann.org</a> [mailto:<a href="mailto:at-review-bounces@icann.org">at-review-bounces@icann.org</a>] On<br>> Behalf Of Alice Jansen<br>
> Sent: Tuesday, 7 December 2010 11:14<br>> To: <a href="mailto:at-review@icann.org">at-review@icann.org</a><br>> Cc: <a href="mailto:jbladel@godaddy.com">jbladel@godaddy.com</a>; <a href="mailto:paul.szyndler@auda.org.au">paul.szyndler@auda.org.au</a>; '<a href="mailto:guofeng@catr.cn">guofeng@catr.cn</a>';<br>
> <a href="mailto:FAlexander@ntia.doc.gov">FAlexander@ntia.doc.gov</a><br>> Subject: [AT-Review] ATRT Final recommendations - Draft v2<br>> Importance: High<br>><br>> <br>><br>> <br>><br>> __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature<br>
> database 5682 (20101207) __________<br>><br>> The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.<br>><br>> <a href="http://www.eset.com">http://www.eset.com</a><br>><br>> __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature<br>
> database 5682 (20101207) __________<br>><br>> The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.<br>><br>> <a href="http://www.eset.com">http://www.eset.com</a><br>><br>> _______________________________________________<br>
> AT-Review mailing list<br>> <a href="mailto:AT-Review@icann.org">AT-Review@icann.org</a><br>> <a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-review">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-review</a><br>><br>
><br><br>