[atrt2] Preliminary report - Call 22 Feb 2013
drc at virtualized.org
Fri Feb 22 23:29:53 UTC 2013
On Feb 22, 2013, at 3:10 PM, Brian Cute <brianacute at gmail.com> wrote:
> As a point of reference, ATRT1 established a rule of open and transparent meetings and work. The Team established the possibility of "closed session" with Chatham House Rule if necessary but to also provide a summary or closed sessions for the community/public.
That seems eminently reasonable. Were there any negative repercussions that the first ATRT experienced that would suggest we not follow this rule with ATRT2?
More information about the atrt2