[atrt2] Preliminary report - Call 22 Feb 2013

David Conrad drc at virtualized.org
Fri Feb 22 23:29:53 UTC 2013


On Feb 22, 2013, at 3:10 PM, Brian Cute <brianacute at gmail.com> wrote:
> As a point of reference, ATRT1 established a rule of open and transparent meetings and work.  The Team established the possibility of "closed session" with Chatham House Rule if necessary but to also provide a summary or closed sessions for the community/public.

That seems eminently reasonable. Were there any negative repercussions that the first ATRT experienced that would suggest we not follow this rule with ATRT2?


More information about the atrt2 mailing list