[atrt2] Meeting in Beijing

Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond ocl at gih.com
Sun Feb 24 01:07:42 UTC 2013


+1 Doodle please. And rather than playing with mastermind-like
combinations, the Doodle can have 5AM/5PM, 6AM/6PM, 12AM/12PM, etc.

Thanks,

Olivier

On 23/02/2013 21:20, David Conrad wrote:
> Perhaps I might suggest a doodle poll so we can resolve this sooner rather than later?
>
> Regards,
> -drc
>
> On Feb 23, 2013, at 7:56 AM, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca> wrote:
>
>> I guess one cannot proof-read something too many times. Yes, the dates before the meeting are 5 and 6.
>>
>> So the options I listed should be:
>>
>> a) 5, 6 (Before)
>> b) 12, 13 (After with no break)
>> c) 13, 14 (After with a break)
>> d) 6, 12 (Split with no break)
>> e) 6, 13 (Split with a break)
>>
>> Alan
>>
>> At 23/02/2013 03:30 AM, Lise Fuhr wrote:
>>
>>> It seems that the dates that Alan has suggested are bit wrong. Saturday is the 6 April and if that is what is meant by d) this is perfect for me. I agree we should meet in Beijing.
>>> Best
>>> Lise
>>>
>>>
>>> Den 23/02/2013 kl. 00.36 skrev David Conrad <drc at virtualized.org>:
>>>
>>>> I agree with Avri both in that I can live with any of the options but see some advantage in (d).
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> -drc
>>>>
>>>> On Feb 22, 2013, at 3:25 PM, Avri Doria <avri at acm.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for starting the conversation.
>>>>>
>>>>> I agree with the reasoning and can live with any of the options.
>>>>> My preference is for (d).
>>>>>
>>>>> I like the idea of getting a day in before, i.e. bracketing the ICANN meeting with our meeting.
>>>>>
>>>>> avri
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 22 Feb 2013, at 18:18, Alan Greenberg wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> To kick off the discussion, Since a large number of our group will be
>>>>>> in Beijing, I don't think that we can afford not to meet there. We
>>>>>> are starting far later than originally planned, but still trying to
>>>>>> make the original deadline of 31-Dec. I think a 2nd face-to-face
>>>>>> meeting near the start of our work is valuable, so it is either
>>>>>> Beijing, or moving the entire group to somewhere else very close (in
>>>>>> time) to the Beijing meeting.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If we are looking for two days (which seems reasonable to me), there
>>>>>> seem to be several potential options from the two days preceding the
>>>>>> start of many meetings (Fri Apr 4, Sat Apr 5) and the three days
>>>>>> after (Fri Apr 12, Sat Apr 13, Sun Apr 14). Note that some of us are
>>>>>> scheduled for other meetings on Sat, Apr 5 (I am), but probably not
>>>>>> enough to rule out that day.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If we were to meet only after the ICANN week, my inclination would be
>>>>>> to make it Sat-Sun to give people just a bit of time to clear their
>>>>>> minds and get ready.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So the options seems to be:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> a) 4, 5 (Before)
>>>>>> b) 12, 13 (After with no break)
>>>>>> c) 13, 14 (After with a break)
>>>>>> d) 5, 12 (Split with no break)
>>>>>> e) 5, 13 (Split with a break)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I can live with any of these options but have a preference for a or c.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Alan
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> atrt2 mailing list
>>>>>> atrt2 at icann.org
>>>>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/atrt2
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> atrt2 mailing list
>>>>> atrt2 at icann.org
>>>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/atrt2
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> atrt2 mailing list
>>>> atrt2 at icann.org
>>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/atrt2
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> atrt2 mailing list
>>> atrt2 at icann.org
>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/atrt2
>
> _______________________________________________
> atrt2 mailing list
> atrt2 at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/atrt2
>

-- 
Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhD
http://www.gih.com/ocl.html





More information about the atrt2 mailing list