[atrt2] Egalitarian listing of ATRT2 members?

[demi at nic.br]

+1

demi

Quoting "Avri Doria" <avri at acm.org>:

> Hi,
>
> I am in full support of egalitarian treatment for the various types  
> of participant in this team.
>
> avri
>
> On 23 Feb 2013, at 14:16, Steve Crocker wrote:
>
>> During the organization call Friday I was using a print out of the  
>> members.  It had separate sections for the Volunteer Review Team  
>> members, the Independent Experts and the Ex-Officios.  My  
>> preference is for all of the team members to be considered  
>> uniformly part of the same team, leaving behind the history of how  
>> we were selected.  However, if the team prefers to retain the  
>> distinctions, it's certainly workable.
>>
>> This is a small point, but since I found myself reacting internally  
>>  and, to some extent, tripping over it while I chaired the call, I  
>> thought I'd mention it.
>>
>> Preferences?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Steve
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> atrt2 mailing list
>> atrt2 at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/atrt2
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> atrt2 mailing list
> atrt2 at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/atrt2
>