[atrt2] ATRT2 leadership
alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca
Mon Mar 4 18:12:22 UTC 2013
I think that at least, we should try to decide on what positions we
want and the process we will use.
Although I appreciate the benefits of co-chairs, I personally favour
a Chair and Vice-Chair, with the Chair working closely with the VC,
but nevertheless taking responsibility for the overall process. It
also sets a hierarchy in the time commitment which I think is important.
At 04/03/2013 12:05 PM, Brian Cute wrote:
>I hesitated to make any suggestions since I have put my name forward for
>consideration. However, there have been no suggestions so far so let me
>make a couple and see how the group reacts. With 4 members having
>submitted their respective names to date, we could simply hold a vote in
>Los Angeles to determine the Chair and Vice Chair, Co-Chairs or Chair and
>Alternate Chair positions. Clearly, it would be efficient to agree to the
>Chair structure prior to Los Angeles, if possible. Perhaps we should
>discuss this question via email now to see if we can reach a consensus?
>On 3/4/13 11:36 AM, "Alan Greenberg" <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca> wrote:
> >As others have expressed, I too am willing and interested in the
> >vice-chair position, or for that matter, to serve the review team in
> >any other way that I can.
> >We will be meeting in a week and a half. Are we planning to defer any
> >discussion of how we come to closure on these positions until we meet?
> >atrt2 mailing list
> >atrt2 at icann.org
More information about the atrt2