[atrt2] Open Archive
LStrickling at ntia.doc.gov
Tue Mar 5 00:19:53 UTC 2013
My recollection is that we allowed observers to attend any of our meetings. They did not participate but were allowed to attend and observe in person. Brian, do I remember correctly?
From: atrt2-bounces at icann.org [atrt2-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of David Conrad [drc at virtualized.org]
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2013 6:44 PM
To: Avri Doria
Subject: Re: [atrt2] Open Archive
Thanks for the clarification. I don't have qualms about the meetings being listened to. There might be some concerns about logistics, particularly for live streaming and/or room size for in-person meetings (I'd have no clue how big a room to reserve myself).
Pragmatically speaking, would making transcripts of the meetings publicly available be sufficient?
On Mar 4, 2013, at 3:08 PM, Avri Doria <avri at acm.org> wrote:
> Open in the sense of being listened to, was my point.
> I was not necessarily thinking of the LA sessions, especially, being physically open.
> On 4 Mar 2013, at 17:16, David Conrad wrote:
>> Just so I understand: the desire is to have meetings be open to anyone? Does this also hold true for the in-person meetings?
> atrt2 mailing list
> atrt2 at icann.org
atrt2 mailing list
atrt2 at icann.org
More information about the atrt2