[atrt2] Questions for Public Comment
bcute at pir.org
Sat Mar 30 04:20:27 UTC 2013
Leaving out the last question was an oversight. I can insert it in the
final version. Is the edit to your question re: Staff and the PDP
satisfactory or do you have a proposed construction? Thanks.
On 3/29/13 10:40 PM, "Avril Doria" <avri at acm.org> wrote:
>I was not able to open what I received, but I was able to pull it from
>Re 9.1 (e)
>To what extent has ICANN Staff been bound its decision-making by the
>ICANn Policy Development Process?
>To what extent has ICANN Staff been accountable in its decision-making?
>One of the biggest questions over the years has been a possible
>appearance of ICANN Staff making independent decision on policy matters
>that do no bear direct or even indirect resemblance to the Policy
>decisions made in the policy development process. sometime these appear
>to some people as to run counter to previous Policy Decisions, while in
>other case it may appear that they are making policy decisions on issues
>that have not yet been subjected to the PDP.
>So The original question asked whether ICANN Staff appeared as if it
>accepted Community Policy Development processes as binding on its
>activities. And in deviating, if indeed there are deviations, to what
>extent does ICANN staff appear to be accountable to the ICANN Policy
>I also notice that you eliminated the last question I added:
>1. Are there other questions we should be asking consistent with the
>mandate of the ATRT? What are these questions? How would you answer
>Is this problematic?
>I think it makes sense to ask the community whether there are questions
>they think need to be asked that we have overlooked.
>On 29 Mar 2013, at 21:37, Brian Cute wrote:
>> Larry, Carlos and Avri,
>> I have accepted your suggested edits and draw your attention to two
>> remaining questions:
>> Paragraph regarding AoC 9.1(b): question #6 in the document. Carlos
>> clarified that the questions focus on the GAC. Therefore, the substance
>> of the question is not redundant with question #4. I made one edit and
>> for final views on this question.
>> Paragraph regarding AoC 9.1(e): question #15 in the document. Avri, I
>> made a suggested edit in an attempt to answer Larry's request for
>> clarification. Is my edit consistent with the intent of your question
>> does it add clarity?
>> Please weigh in as soon as possible so we can get this document to Staff
>> for publication to the Community. Thank you.
>> On 3/29/13 1:23 PM, "Larry Strickling" <LStrickling at ntia.doc.gov> wrote:
>>> Some suggested edits and comments. I accepted all of Brian's changes
>>> then edited from there.
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Brian Cute [mailto:bcute at pir.org]
>>> Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2013 11:28 PM
>>> To: Larry Strickling; Carlos Raul Gutierrez; Avril Doria
>>> Cc: ATRT2
>>> Subject: Questions for Public Comment
>>> For Larry, Carlos and Avri,
>>> Please review the edited version of the Questions for Public Comment.
>>> have tried to organize the questions under specific headings as
>>> by Olivier. Please provide a rapid response with final edits to the
>>> document as I would like to provide the final version to ICANN Staff
>>> translation and posting as soon as possible. Thank you.
>atrt2 mailing list
>atrt2 at icann.org
More information about the atrt2