[atrt2] Questions for Public Comment
Brian Cute
bcute at pir.org
Sat Mar 30 04:20:27 UTC 2013
Avri,
Leaving out the last question was an oversight. I can insert it in the
final version. Is the edit to your question re: Staff and the PDP
satisfactory or do you have a proposed construction? Thanks.
Brian
On 3/29/13 10:40 PM, "Avril Doria" <avri at acm.org> wrote:
>hi,
>
>I was not able to open what I received, but I was able to pull it from
>the archive.
>
>Re 9.1 (e)
>
>"
>To what extent has ICANN Staff been bound its decision-making by the
>ICANn Policy Development Process?
>"
>"
>To what extent has ICANN Staff been accountable in its decision-making?
>"
>
>One of the biggest questions over the years has been a possible
>appearance of ICANN Staff making independent decision on policy matters
>that do no bear direct or even indirect resemblance to the Policy
>decisions made in the policy development process. sometime these appear
>to some people as to run counter to previous Policy Decisions, while in
>other case it may appear that they are making policy decisions on issues
>that have not yet been subjected to the PDP.
>
>So The original question asked whether ICANN Staff appeared as if it
>accepted Community Policy Development processes as binding on its
>activities. And in deviating, if indeed there are deviations, to what
>extent does ICANN staff appear to be accountable to the ICANN Policy
>Development Process.
>
>
>I also notice that you eliminated the last question I added:
>
>"
>Other
>
>
>1. Are there other questions we should be asking consistent with the
>mandate of the ATRT? What are these questions? How would you answer
>these questions?
>"
>
>Is this problematic?
>
>I think it makes sense to ask the community whether there are questions
>they think need to be asked that we have overlooked.
>
>thanks
>
>avri
>
>
>
>On 29 Mar 2013, at 21:37, Brian Cute wrote:
>
>> Larry, Carlos and Avri,
>>
>> I have accepted your suggested edits and draw your attention to two
>> remaining questions:
>>
>> Paragraph regarding AoC 9.1(b): question #6 in the document. Carlos
>> clarified that the questions focus on the GAC. Therefore, the substance
>> of the question is not redundant with question #4. I made one edit and
>>ask
>> for final views on this question.
>>
>> Paragraph regarding AoC 9.1(e): question #15 in the document. Avri, I
>> made a suggested edit in an attempt to answer Larry's request for
>> clarification. Is my edit consistent with the intent of your question
>>and
>> does it add clarity?
>>
>> Please weigh in as soon as possible so we can get this document to Staff
>> for publication to the Community. Thank you.
>>
>> Brian
>>
>>
>>
>> On 3/29/13 1:23 PM, "Larry Strickling" <LStrickling at ntia.doc.gov> wrote:
>>
>>> Some suggested edits and comments. I accepted all of Brian's changes
>>>and
>>> then edited from there.
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Brian Cute [mailto:bcute at pir.org]
>>> Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2013 11:28 PM
>>> To: Larry Strickling; Carlos Raul Gutierrez; Avril Doria
>>> Cc: ATRT2
>>> Subject: Questions for Public Comment
>>>
>>> For Larry, Carlos and Avri,
>>>
>>> Please review the edited version of the Questions for Public Comment.
>>>I
>>> have tried to organize the questions under specific headings as
>>>suggested
>>> by Olivier. Please provide a rapid response with final edits to the
>>> document as I would like to provide the final version to ICANN Staff
>>>for
>>> translation and posting as soon as possible. Thank you.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Brian
>>
>> <winmail.dat>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>atrt2 mailing list
>atrt2 at icann.org
>https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/atrt2
More information about the atrt2
mailing list