[atrt2] Questions for Public Comment

[Avri Doria]

Hi,

Not really.  And perhaps the difference is just a nuance.

One is asking whether there are other issues the ATRT2 should be addressing.
The other is asking whether we are asking all the right questions.

On a visceral level, haven't you ever gone through an entire questionnaire only to feel that it did not ask you the most important question?  It is also an intersting metric/indicator on a questionnaire.  If it remains blank, or is only answered trivially, it tends to indicate that the questionnaire hits the most important questions.

If you hate the question about questions that much, and I admit it is more of a meta-question (question about the questions), I won't protest though I think it is a question that belongs there.  It sort of admits that even in creating a questionnaire we are accountable to the public for correction.

But it is your call.

avri



On 30 Mar 2013, at 09:00, Brian Cute wrote:

> Avri,
> 
> I added your question re: the PDP.  Upon further review, the question on
> Improving Accountability and Transparency near the end of the document is
> drafted as a "catch all."  I revised it to add the word "questions" that
> the ATRT2 should be reviewing.  Does that sufficiently capture the
> question your were trying to pose?
> 
> Carlos,
> 
> I edited question #10 to read "ICANN" instead of "ICANN community."  Is
> that consistent with your intent?
> 
> I would like this to be the last revision so we can get the questions
> published.  Please respond rapidly.
> 
> Regards,
> Brian
> 
> On 3/30/13 8:04 AM, "Avri Doria" <avri at ella.com> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> On 30 Mar 2013, at 00:20, Brian Cute wrote:
>> 
>>> Avri,
>>> 
>>> Leaving out the last question was an oversight.
>>> I can insert it in the
>>> final version.  
>> 
>> Thanks
>> 
>>> Is the edit to your question re: Staff and the PDP
>>> satisfactory or do you have a proposed construction?
>> 
>> Does the following (or some variant) work?
>> 
>> What is your assessment of ICANN Staff adherence to the policy decisions
>> of the ICANN Policy Development Process in its operational activities.
>> Has ICANN Staff been accountable to the ICANN community in its activities?
>> Can you give examples of where ICANN Staff has restricted its
>> decision-making to the boundaries set by the Policy Development
>> Processes?  Can you give examples where ICANN Staff has gone beyond the
>> ICANN Community Policy Development Process to either make new policy or
>> replace existing policy without Community development process or
>> consultation?  Are there specific accountability issues the ATRT2 should
>> explore related to ICANN Staff's interactions with the Community Policy
>> Development Process?
>> 
>> Thanks
>> 
>> avri
>> 
>> 
>>> Thanks.
>>> 
>>> Brian
>>> 
>>> On 3/29/13 10:40 PM, "Avril Doria" <avri at acm.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> hi,
>>>> 
>>>> I was not able to open what I received, but I was able to pull it from
>>>> the archive.
>>>> 
>>>> Re 9.1 (e)
>>>> 
>>>> "
>>>> To what extent has ICANN Staff been bound its decision-making by the
>>>> ICANn Policy Development Process?
>>>> "
>>>> "
>>>> To what extent has ICANN Staff been accountable in its decision-making?
>>>> "
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> atrt2 mailing list
>> atrt2 at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/atrt2
> 
> <Structuring Public Comment Questions - v4.docx>_______________________________________________
> atrt2 mailing list
> atrt2 at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/atrt2