[atrt2] Questions for Public Comment
David Conrad
drc at virtualized.org
Sat Mar 30 22:38:22 UTC 2013
Hi,
Apologies for not providing these comments/edits earlier (just back from travel). The executive summary of the edits:
- tried to make the questions more quantitative by asking for a response along a scale (1 to 10). As mentioned on the call, I do not think a binary yes/no for most of the questions provides particularly useful information since I suspect most folks will want to answer "sometimes yes, sometimes no".
- asked for more suggestions of metrics
- various consistency and consolidation edits trying to make the questions more readable (at least for me).
With respect to the comments, I found a number of places in which I was confused about what was being referenced. Perhaps that's just me, however.
FWIW, use as you see fit.
Regards,
-drc
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Structuring Public Comment Questions - v5-drc.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 46758 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/atrt2/attachments/20130330/f5d0e12a/StructuringPublicCommentQuestions-v5-drc.docx>
-------------- next part --------------
On Mar 30, 2013, at 7:07 AM, Brian Cute <bcute at pir.org> wrote:
> Latest version of the document including Avri's question.
>
> Last question for you Carlos, regarding the suggested edit to question #
> 10 that appears in v.4. Please let me know if that is consistent with
> your intent. Thank you.
>
> Regards,
> Brian
>
> On 3/30/13 9:00 AM, "Brian Cute" <bcute at pir.org> wrote:
>
>> Avri,
>>
>> I added your question re: the PDP. Upon further review, the question on
>> Improving Accountability and Transparency near the end of the document is
>> drafted as a "catch all." I revised it to add the word "questions" that
>> the ATRT2 should be reviewing. Does that sufficiently capture the
>> question your were trying to pose?
>>
>> Carlos,
>>
>> I edited question #10 to read "ICANN" instead of "ICANN community." Is
>> that consistent with your intent?
>>
>> I would like this to be the last revision so we can get the questions
>> published. Please respond rapidly.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Brian
>>
>> On 3/30/13 8:04 AM, "Avri Doria" <avri at ella.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On 30 Mar 2013, at 00:20, Brian Cute wrote:
>>>
>>>> Avri,
>>>>
>>>> Leaving out the last question was an oversight.
>>>> I can insert it in the
>>>> final version.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>>> Is the edit to your question re: Staff and the PDP
>>>> satisfactory or do you have a proposed construction?
>>>
>>> Does the following (or some variant) work?
>>>
>>> What is your assessment of ICANN Staff adherence to the policy decisions
>>> of the ICANN Policy Development Process in its operational activities.
>>> Has ICANN Staff been accountable to the ICANN community in its
>>> activities?
>>> Can you give examples of where ICANN Staff has restricted its
>>> decision-making to the boundaries set by the Policy Development
>>> Processes? Can you give examples where ICANN Staff has gone beyond the
>>> ICANN Community Policy Development Process to either make new policy or
>>> replace existing policy without Community development process or
>>> consultation? Are there specific accountability issues the ATRT2 should
>>> explore related to ICANN Staff's interactions with the Community Policy
>>> Development Process?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> avri
>>>
>>>
>>>> Thanks.
>>>>
>>>> Brian
>>>>
>>>> On 3/29/13 10:40 PM, "Avril Doria" <avri at acm.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> I was not able to open what I received, but I was able to pull it from
>>>>> the archive.
>>>>>
>>>>> Re 9.1 (e)
>>>>>
>>>>> "
>>>>> To what extent has ICANN Staff been bound its decision-making by the
>>>>> ICANn Policy Development Process?
>>>>> "
>>>>> "
>>>>> To what extent has ICANN Staff been accountable in its
>>>>> decision-making?
>>>>> "
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> atrt2 mailing list
>>> atrt2 at icann.org
>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/atrt2
>>
>
> <Structuring Public Comment Questions - v5.docx>_______________________________________________
> atrt2 mailing list
> atrt2 at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/atrt2
More information about the atrt2
mailing list