[atrt2] Questions for Public Comment
bcute at pir.org
Tue Apr 2 01:19:13 UTC 2013
Thank you for the clarification. I have edited the questions consistent
with your points below. I also reviewed David Conrad's outstanding
comments and made a few edits to try to add clarification. The document
is now final. Thanks to all who provided drafts and edits.
Alice, please prepare the document for translation and posting to the
Community. We will hold the Comment period open for 21 days after the
close of the Beijing meeting and have a standard 21 day Reply Comment
cycle. Please also add links to the recommendations of the 3 prior Review
Teams in the footnotes on page 1. Thank you.
On 4/1/13 10:14 AM, "Carlos Raúl G." <crg at isoc-cr.org> wrote:
>Sorry, I was traveling. Wording of 10/11 much better. Just two small
>1/ I think the ranking from unacceptable to excellent is better than the
>2/ I don't know how to spell it out, but even the Supreme Court allows
>for minority positions to remain on record. Shouldn't this be possible
>for the PDP process as well? Don't know if it fits better under 10 or 11.
>Greetings from Montevideo.
>Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez
>SUTEL, Costa Rica
>+506 4000 0010 Oficina
>+506 8335 2487 Móvil
>+506 2215 6821 Fax
>El 31/03/2013, a las 23:22, Brian Cute <bcute at pir.org> escribió:
>> Please see David Conrad's questions concerning Q.10 and Q.11, and my
>>prior question concerning Q.10. With the exception of your
>>clarifications in response to David's question and my question, the
>>document is ready to go to ICANN staff for publication. Please respond
>>ASAP. Thank you.
>> P.S. David, thank you for the useful edits.
>> <Structuring Public Comment Questions - v6.docx>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ATRT2 Public Comment Questions.docx
Size: 36723 bytes
Desc: ATRT2 Public Comment Questions.docx
More information about the atrt2