[atrt2] ATRT2 and Public comment - remarks to the meeting today
avri at ella.com
Thu Jun 20 10:56:17 UTC 2013
I very much agree with this.
On 20 Jun 2013, at 06:51, Lise Fuhr wrote:
> Dear all,
> I am sorry I can’t attend the meeting today, but I have some comments about the public comments.
> We have asked for public comments about issues that the ATRT2 should look into in this review.
> In order to respect the comments and the time used creating them, I think it is very important to ensure that all the issues mentioned in the comments are either reflected and specifically taken care of in each work-stream. If not included, we need to specify why the issue isn’t reflected and/or taken care of. This need to be a very explicit explanation.
> This means that we have to make a reply document to the comments (and of course more work), but it will be a way to ensure transparency of our choices to the public.
> atrt2 mailing list
> atrt2 at icann.org
More information about the atrt2