[atrt2] [atrt2-coordination] Slides & Agenda? Session with CSG on Monday

Avri Doria avri at acm.org
Thu Jun 27 15:33:21 UTC 2013

On 27 Jun 2013, at 08:26, Alice Jansen wrote:

> No questions were circulated on the list following Brian's request 

My very very late thoughts on questions, but I wanted to see comments first and this morning was the first chance I had to spend some time on the comments.  Very grateful for the summary.

I have one general question type:

- Only the BC submitted an input to the ATRT questionnaire and none of the constituencies answered the full questionnaire.  
   -  Can you give us a reason for the lack of comments or response? 
   -  Are we asking the wrong questions?  
   -  Asking in the wrong way? 

Specific questions based on BC statement:

- BC used the term “material new obligations”.  Can you give an idea of how this is used?

- Can you give examples of the trend to top down decision making, especially in the way non AOC committees and WG are established.

- What sort of evidence would be sufficient to allow the community to know its recommendations "are considered by ICANN staff and board when making decisions."


More information about the atrt2 mailing list