[atrt2] [atrt2-coordination] Demi's recommended edits
Carlos Raúl G.
crg at isoc-cr.org
Mon Jul 1 08:01:40 UTC 2013
Thank you Alan!
Any news in the letter to Governments?
Sent from my iPhone
On 01/07/2013, at 05:14, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca> wrote:
> Forgot to add:
> Staff is coordinating the following distribution to take place on Monday 1 July by end of business:
> - Direct emails to the firms that responded to ATRT 1 RFP
> - Posting on the ICANN web site
> - Press release for broad distribution
> The list of ATRT1 bidders can be found at http://www.icann.org/en/about/aoc-review/atrt/rfp-respondents-evaluation-19jun10-en.pdf .
> The scoring system used by ATRT for their Independant Expert can be found at http://www.icann.org/en/about/aoc-review/atrt/proposals-evaluation-scoring-sheet-19jun10-en.pdf . We will quickly need to put one together for our evaluation of RFP repsonses.
> At 30/06/2013 10:38 PM, Alan Greenberg wrote:
>> Thanks to Avri for incorporating the suggestions to date. I think that all have been included except for Demi's last suggestion of adding the task of identifying comparable MS processes. I tried adding that, but it made for a very awkward sentence, and it is already implied, since the comparison cannot be done without first identifying what to compare to (thanks to Avri for pointing that out).
>> I did some punctuation cleanup, and have one other suggestion for a change, removing the word "encouraging" from "...whether the PDP process could be strengthened by encouraging the submission of views and advice from the GAC whether the PDP process could be strengthened by encouraging the submission of views and advice from the GAC..." since it is not the encouraging that would not change anything, but the actual submission. That change is redlined in the version attached.
>> Larisa has also made some administrative changes.
>> Unless I hear anything further (about that last changes or anything else in the RFP), I will send give staff the go-ahead to issue the RFP at 16:00 UTC on Monday (9 am PST and 2 hours after the end of our call with the CSG).
>> At 30/06/2013 05:51 PM, Avri Doria wrote:
>>> I move one bullet, but could not come up with wording for his Identify clause.
>>> Seems like one would have to identify them before benchmarking against them.
>>> On 30 Jun 2013, at 12:41, Avri Doria wrote:
>>> > Hi,
>>> > Anyone want to take them on?
>>> > If so, may I pass the editor token to you?
>>> > avri
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > atrt2-coordination mailing list
>>> > atrt2-coordination at icann.org
>>> > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/atrt2-coordination
>>> atrt2-coordination mailing list
>>> atrt2-coordination at icann.org
>> atrt2 mailing list
>> atrt2 at icann.org
> atrt2 mailing list
> atrt2 at icann.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the atrt2