[atrt2] Comment passed to me: Re AC/SO periodic reviews
avri at acm.org
Tue Jul 16 08:02:58 UTC 2013
Just to put it on the record:
While the periodic reviews are an important part of the process whether the 3 year cycle is right is questioned.
By the time the review is done, discussed and implemented - especially given the time it takes to effect an organizational change - 3 years may have long since elapsed.
Is there way to give a more realistic definition of a reasonable cycle.
More information about the atrt2