[atrt2] Master with edits

Lise Fuhr lise.fuhr at difo.dk
Tue Oct 15 19:34:35 UTC 2013

Dear all,


I am not at all happy about the last section of our executive summary:


In the Final Report, ATRT2 will consider “prioritizing” certain
Recommendations based on their respective importance.  ATRT2 considers
Recommendations relating to the Board, GAC, Metrics and Multilingualism to
be priority Recommendations.  ATRT2 welcomes feedback on prioritization of
proposed Recommendations from the Community.


What will this prioritizing mean? That the board should implement these
recommendations first. Or the board can choose not to implement the other
recommendations because they are not prioritized? I thought that giving a
time-frame for implementing would give the idea of the urgency of the
different recommendations.


I know it was briefly discussed at the conference call October 1 but I can’t
see final decision on the issue. I find that the implications of
prioritizing is not clear in our report and would recommend that we write
more explicit what we mean by prioritizing and that we expect that all the
recommendations is to be implemented.






Fra: atrt2-bounces at icann.org [mailto:atrt2-bounces at icann.org] På vegne af
Brian Cute
Sendt: 15. oktober 2013 21:08
Til: Larisa B. Gurnick; Charla Shambley; Alice Jansen
Cc: atrt2 at icann.org (atrt2 at icann.org)
Emne: [atrt2] Master with edits




Here is the updated version.  Have not changed all the numbering.  Call me
if you questions.



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/atrt2/attachments/20131015/af02a051/attachment.html>

More information about the atrt2 mailing list