[atrt2] Master with edits
alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca
Tue Oct 15 20:06:46 UTC 2013
Lisa, I consider prioritizing a very wrong
decision. I would have prefered that we had not
said this, but I can live with the words in this
draft report, because it only says we will
CONSIDER doing it. This was a suggestion made by Mr Zhang.
At 15/10/2013 03:34 PM, Lise Fuhr wrote:
>I am not at all happy about the last section of our executive summary:
>In the Final Report, ATRT2 will consider
>prioritizing certain Recommendations based on
>their respective importance. ATRT2 considers
>Recommendations relating to the Board, GAC,
>Metrics and Multilingualism to be priority
>Recommendations. ATRT2 welcomes feedback on
>prioritization of proposed Recommendations from the Community.
>What will this prioritizing mean? That the board
>should implement these recommendations first. Or
>the board can choose not to implement the other
>recommendations because they are not
>prioritized? I thought that giving a time-frame
>for implementing would give the idea of the
>urgency of the different recommendations.
>I know it was briefly discussed at the
>conference call October 1 but I cant see final
>decision on the issue. I find that the
>implications of prioritizing is not clear in our
>report and would recommend that we write more
>explicit what we mean by prioritizing and that
>we expect that all the recommendations is to be implemented.
>Fra: atrt2-bounces at icann.org
>[mailto:atrt2-bounces at icann.org] På vegne af Brian Cute
>Sendt: 15. oktober 2013 21:08
>Til: Larisa B. Gurnick; Charla Shambley; Alice Jansen
>Cc: atrt2 at icann.org (atrt2 at icann.org)
>Emne: [atrt2] Master with edits
>Here is the updated version. Have not changed
>all the numbering. Call me if you questions.
>atrt2 mailing list
>atrt2 at icann.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the atrt2