[atrt2] Revised GAC related recommendations

[Fiona Alexander]

Hi Steve

It has been suggested that these things are happening in practice but have yet to be codified in a bylaw change in large part due to the BGRI preference to at some point propose a package of bylaw changes as opposed to just one in a piece meal fashion.  I would look to Heather and perhaps ICANN staff to confirm.

Fiona

-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Crocker [mailto:steve at shinkuro.com] 
Sent: Friday, December 13, 2013 6:21 PM
To: Fiona Alexander
Cc: Steve Crocker; ATRT2 (atrt2 at icann.org)
Subject: Re: [atrt2] Revised GAC related recommendations

Fiona,

In the table on page 4, the assessment of recommendation 11 ends with "Issue of proposing and adopting related Bylaws changes remains open."

I may have completely missed this.  What Bylaws changes were discussed?  In the recommendation from ATRT1, the only mention of Bylaws is at the end, "This process ... should consider establishing other mechanisms by which the Board and the GAC can satisfy the Bylaw provisions relating to GAC advice."

Can you clarify for me?

Thanks,

Steve



On Dec 13, 2013, at 6:03 PM, Fiona Alexander <FAlexander at ntia.doc.gov> wrote:

> Attached please find the GAC related recommendations template.   The new additions are left in redline for ease of identification and begin on page 12.  This includes a summary of the relevant public comments received up till 4 pm today.
> 
> Fiona
> <ATRT2 GAC Recommendations Dec 13.docx>_______________________________________________
> atrt2 mailing list
> atrt2 at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/atrt2