[atrt2] Prioritization Doodle Poll

Demi Getschko demi at nic.br
Thu Dec 19 13:55:30 UTC 2013


Agree that it doesn't make much sense in trying to prioritize these 12 
items.... I missed the end-time of the doodle pool. Sorry.
best
demi
>
> Yes we discussed it but I am still against prioritization – so I 
> filled the Doodle with a plus to every subject since I think all our 
> recommendations should be equally important. I think saying no to all 
> recommendations in the Doodle would be to say none is important, so…..
>
> Best,
>
> Lise
>
> *Fra:*atrt2-bounces at icann.org [mailto:atrt2-bounces at icann.org] *På 
> vegne af *Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond
> *Sendt:* 19. december 2013 02:47
> *Til:* atrt2 at icann.org
> *Emne:* Re: [atrt2] Prioritization Doodle Poll
>
> Thank you for your explanation, Denise. Yes, I had dropped from the 
> last call when this was discussed (darn) - apologies for the 
> misunderstanding.
> Kind regards,
>
> Olivier
>
> On 19/12/2013 02:26, Denise Michel wrote:
>
>     Dear Olivier,
>
>     For the sake of clarity (and you may have gotten dropped from the
>     last call when this was discussed?) -- the Team decided to
>     consider prioritizing and asked staff to send this poll. This came
>     out of a request from Zhang Xinsheng to prioritize the
>     recommendations.
>
>     Regards,
>
>     Denise
>
>     On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 4:02 PM, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond
>     <ocl at gih.com <mailto:ocl at gih.com>> wrote:
>
>     Dear Larisa,
>
>     I am sorry but I will not prioritise any of these recommendations.
>     This is purely an ICANN thing to prioritise things which are all
>     important, for the sole purpose of demoting the importance of some
>     of the recommendations because let's face it, that's exactly what
>     we are doing.l
>     There are 12 recommendations; ICANN is purporting to be a world
>     class organisation... and it needs to have a committee help it
>     throttle the rate at which these recommendations are implemented?
>     For this reason, and I apologise for this, I shall not fill the
>     doodle poll.
>     Kind regards,
>
>     Olivier
>
>
>
>     On 18/12/2013 05:48, Larisa B. Gurnick wrote:
>
>         Dear ATRT2 Members,
>
>         As discussed on the ATRT2 call on 17 December, please indicate
>         which recommendations you would consider to be “priority”
>         recommendations by voting in the Doodle Poll
>         _http://doodle.com/yxidhmrupcbfmb4u. *This Doodle Poll will
>         close by 23:59 UTC on 18 December.*_ Depending on the results
>         of this Poll, further discussion and consideration will be
>         given, via email, to the possibility of including
>         prioritization guidance in the Final Report.
>
>         Here is a recap of the recommendations for ease of reference:
>
>         #1 The Board should develop objective measures for determining
>         the quality of ICANN Board members and the success of Board
>         improvement efforts, and analyze those findings over time.
>
>         #2 The Board should develop metrics to measure the
>         effectiveness of the Board’s functioning and improvement
>         efforts, and publish the materials used for training to gauge
>         levels of improvement.
>
>         #3 The Board should conduct qualitative/quantitative studies
>         to determine how the qualifications of Board candidate pools
>         change over time , and regularly assess Director’s
>         compensation levels against prevailing standards.
>
>         #4 The Board should continue supporting cross-community
>         engagement aimed at developing an understanding of the
>         distinction between policy development and policy
>         implementation. Develop complementary mechanisms whereby the
>         Supporting Organizations and Advisory Committees (SO/AC) can
>         consult with the Board on matters, including, but not limited
>         to policy, implementation and administrative matters, on which
>         the Board makes decisions.
>
>         #5 The Board should review redaction standards for Board
>         documents, Document Information Disclosure Policy (DIDP) and
>         any other ICANN documents to create a single published
>         redaction policy. Institute a process to regularly evaluate
>         redacted material to determine if redactions are still
>         required and if not, ensure that redactions are removed.
>
>         #6 GAC-related recommendation
>
>         #7 The Board should explore mechanisms to improve public
>         comment through adjusted time allotments, forward planning
>         regarding the number of consultations given anticipated growth
>         in participation, and new tools that facilitate participation.
>         The Board also should establish a process under the Public
>         Comment Process where those who commented or replied during
>         the Public Comment and/or Reply Comment period(s) can request
>         changes to the synthesis reports in cases where they believe
>         the Staff incorrectly summarized their comment(s).
>
>         #8 To support public participation, the Board should review
>         capacity of the language services department versus the
>         Community need for the service using Key Performance
>         Indicators (KPIs) and make relevant adjustments such as
>         improving translation quality and timeliness and
>         interpretation quality. ICANN should implement continuous
>         improvement of translation and interpretation services
>         including benchmarking of procedures used by international
>         organizations such as the United Nations.
>
>         #9 Consideration of decision-making inputs and appeals processes
>
>         #10 The Board should improve the effectiveness of
>         cross-community deliberations
>
>         #11 Effectiveness of the Review Process
>
>         #12 Financial Accountability and Transparency
>
>         */Larisa B. Gurnick/*
>
>         Consultant/Senior Director, Organizational Reviews
>
>         Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
>
>         larisa.gurnick at icann.org <mailto:larisa.gurnick at icann.org>
>
>         310 383-8995 <tel:310%20383-8995>
>
>
>
>         _______________________________________________
>
>         atrt2 mailing list
>
>         atrt2 at icann.org  <mailto:atrt2 at icann.org>
>
>         https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/atrt2
>
>
>
>     -- 
>
>     Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhD
>
>     http://www.gih.com/ocl.html
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     atrt2 mailing list
>     atrt2 at icann.org <mailto:atrt2 at icann.org>
>     https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/atrt2
>
>
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>
>     atrt2 mailing list
>
>     atrt2 at icann.org  <mailto:atrt2 at icann.org>
>
>     https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/atrt2
>
>
>
> -- 
> Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhD
> http://www.gih.com/ocl.html
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> atrt2 mailing list
> atrt2 at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/atrt2



More information about the atrt2 mailing list