[atrt2] Prioritization Doodle Poll

Alan Greenberg alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca
Thu Dec 19 15:54:22 UTC 2013


I unfortunately did not get to the Doodle before 
it closed, but I already said I would have done 
the opposite of Lise to express the SAME opinion.

Alan

At 19/12/2013 05:16 AM, Lise Fuhr wrote:


>Hi Olivier,
>
>Yes we discussed it but I am still against 
>prioritization – so I filled the Doodle with a 
>plus to every subject since I think all our 
>recommendations should be equally important. I 
>think saying no to all recommendations in the 
>Doodle would be to say none is important, so
..
>
>Best,
>Lise
>
>Fra: atrt2-bounces at icann.org 
>[mailto:atrt2-bounces at icann.org] På vegne af Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond
>Sendt: 19. december 2013 02:47
>Til: atrt2 at icann.org
>Emne: Re: [atrt2] Prioritization Doodle Poll
>
>Thank you for your explanation, Denise. Yes, I 
>had dropped from the last call when this was 
>discussed (darn) - apologies for the misunderstanding.
>Kind regards,
>
>Olivier
>
>On 19/12/2013 02:26, Denise Michel wrote:
>Dear Olivier,
>
>For the sake of clarity (and you may have gotten 
>dropped from the last call when this was 
>discussed?) -- the Team decided to consider 
>prioritizing and asked staff to send this poll. 
>This came out of a request from Zhang Xinsheng 
>to prioritize the recommendations.
>
>Regards,
>Denise
>
>On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 4:02 PM, Olivier MJ 
>Crepin-Leblond <<mailto:ocl at gih.com>ocl at gih.com> wrote:
>Dear Larisa,
>
>I am sorry but I will not prioritise any of 
>these recommendations. This is purely an ICANN 
>thing to prioritise things which are all 
>important, for the sole purpose of demoting the 
>importance of some of the recommendations 
>because let's face it, that's exactly what we are doing.
>There are 12 recommendations; ICANN is 
>purporting to be a world class organisation... 
>and it needs to have a committee help it 
>throttle the rate at which these recommendations are implemented?
>For this reason, and I apologise for this, I shall not fill the doodle poll.
>Kind regards,
>
>Olivier
>
>
>On 18/12/2013 05:48, Larisa B. Gurnick wrote:
>Dear ATRT2 Members,
>
>As discussed on the ATRT2 call on 17 December, 
>please indicate which recommendations you would 
>consider to be “priority” recommendations by 
>voting in the Doodle Poll 
><http://doodle.com/yxidhmrupcbfmb4u>http://doodle.com/yxidhmrupcbfmb4u. 
>This Doodle Poll will close by 23:59 UTC on 18 
>December.  Depending on the results of this 
>Poll, further discussion and consideration will 
>be given, via email, to the possibility of 
>including prioritization guidance in the Final Report.
>
>
>Here is a recap of the recommendations for ease of reference:
>
>#1        The Board should develop objective 
>measures for determining the quality of ICANN 
>Board members and the success of Board 
>improvement efforts, and analyze those findings over time.
>
>#2        The Board should develop metrics to 
>measure the effectiveness of the Board’s 
>functioning and improvement efforts, and publish 
>the materials used for training to gauge levels of improvement.
>
>#3        The Board should conduct 
>qualitative/quantitative studies to determine 
>how the qualifications of Board candidate pools 
>change over time , and regularly assess 
>Director’s compensation levels against prevailing standards.
>
>#4        The Board should continue supporting 
>cross-community engagement aimed at developing 
>an understanding of the distinction between 
>policy development and policy 
>implementation.  Develop complementary 
>mechanisms whereby the Supporting Organizations 
>and Advisory Committees (SO/AC) can consult with 
>the Board on matters, including, but not limited 
>to policy, implementation and administrative 
>matters, on which the Board makes decisions.
>
>#5        The Board should review redaction 
>standards for Board documents, Document 
>Information Disclosure Policy (DIDP) and any 
>other ICANN documents to create a single 
>published redaction policy. Institute a process 
>to regularly evaluate redacted material to 
>determine if redactions are still required and 
>if not, ensure that redactions are removed.
>
>#6        GAC-related recommendation
>
>#7        The Board should explore mechanisms to 
>improve public comment through adjusted time 
>allotments, forward planning regarding the 
>number of consultations given anticipated growth 
>in participation, and new tools that facilitate 
>participation.  The Board also should establish 
>a process under the Public Comment Process where 
>those who commented or replied during the Public 
>Comment and/or Reply Comment period(s) can 
>request changes to the synthesis reports in 
>cases where they believe the Staff incorrectly summarized their comment(s).
>
>#8        To support public participation, the 
>Board should review capacity of the language 
>services department versus the Community need 
>for the service using Key Performance Indicators 
>(KPIs) and make relevant adjustments such as 
>improving translation quality and timeliness and 
>interpretation quality. ICANN should implement 
>continuous improvement of translation and 
>interpretation services including benchmarking 
>of procedures used by international organizations such as the United Nations.
>
>#9        Consideration of decision-making inputs and appeals processes
>
>#10      The Board should improve the 
>effectiveness of cross-community deliberations
>
>#11      Effectiveness of the Review Process
>
>#12      Financial Accountability and Transparency
>
>
>Larisa B. Gurnick
>Consultant/Senior Director, Organizational Reviews
>Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
><mailto:larisa.gurnick at icann.org>larisa.gurnick at icann.org
><tel:310%20383-8995>310 383-8995
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>
>atrt2 mailing list
>
><mailto:atrt2 at icann.org>atrt2 at icann.org
>
>https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/atrt2
>
>
>
>--
>
>Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhD
>
><http://www.gih.com/ocl.html>http://www.gih.com/ocl.html
>
>_______________________________________________
>atrt2 mailing list
><mailto:atrt2 at icann.org>atrt2 at icann.org
>https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/atrt2
>
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>
>atrt2 mailing list
>
><mailto:atrt2 at icann.org>atrt2 at icann.org
>
>https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/atrt2
>
>
>
>--
>
>Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhD
>
><http://www.gih.com/ocl.html>http://www.gih.com/ocl.html
>_______________________________________________
>atrt2 mailing list
>atrt2 at icann.org
>https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/atrt2
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/atrt2/attachments/20131219/b0d3a0d0/attachment.html>


More information about the atrt2 mailing list