[atrt2] Prioritization Doodle Poll
Alan Greenberg
alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca
Thu Dec 19 15:54:22 UTC 2013
I unfortunately did not get to the Doodle before
it closed, but I already said I would have done
the opposite of Lise to express the SAME opinion.
Alan
At 19/12/2013 05:16 AM, Lise Fuhr wrote:
>Hi Olivier,
>
>Yes we discussed it but I am still against
>prioritization so I filled the Doodle with a
>plus to every subject since I think all our
>recommendations should be equally important. I
>think saying no to all recommendations in the
>Doodle would be to say none is important, so
..
>
>Best,
>Lise
>
>Fra: atrt2-bounces at icann.org
>[mailto:atrt2-bounces at icann.org] På vegne af Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond
>Sendt: 19. december 2013 02:47
>Til: atrt2 at icann.org
>Emne: Re: [atrt2] Prioritization Doodle Poll
>
>Thank you for your explanation, Denise. Yes, I
>had dropped from the last call when this was
>discussed (darn) - apologies for the misunderstanding.
>Kind regards,
>
>Olivier
>
>On 19/12/2013 02:26, Denise Michel wrote:
>Dear Olivier,
>
>For the sake of clarity (and you may have gotten
>dropped from the last call when this was
>discussed?) -- the Team decided to consider
>prioritizing and asked staff to send this poll.
>This came out of a request from Zhang Xinsheng
>to prioritize the recommendations.
>
>Regards,
>Denise
>
>On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 4:02 PM, Olivier MJ
>Crepin-Leblond <<mailto:ocl at gih.com>ocl at gih.com> wrote:
>Dear Larisa,
>
>I am sorry but I will not prioritise any of
>these recommendations. This is purely an ICANN
>thing to prioritise things which are all
>important, for the sole purpose of demoting the
>importance of some of the recommendations
>because let's face it, that's exactly what we are doing.
>There are 12 recommendations; ICANN is
>purporting to be a world class organisation...
>and it needs to have a committee help it
>throttle the rate at which these recommendations are implemented?
>For this reason, and I apologise for this, I shall not fill the doodle poll.
>Kind regards,
>
>Olivier
>
>
>On 18/12/2013 05:48, Larisa B. Gurnick wrote:
>Dear ATRT2 Members,
>
>As discussed on the ATRT2 call on 17 December,
>please indicate which recommendations you would
>consider to be priority recommendations by
>voting in the Doodle Poll
><http://doodle.com/yxidhmrupcbfmb4u>http://doodle.com/yxidhmrupcbfmb4u.
>This Doodle Poll will close by 23:59 UTC on 18
>December. Depending on the results of this
>Poll, further discussion and consideration will
>be given, via email, to the possibility of
>including prioritization guidance in the Final Report.
>
>
>Here is a recap of the recommendations for ease of reference:
>
>#1 The Board should develop objective
>measures for determining the quality of ICANN
>Board members and the success of Board
>improvement efforts, and analyze those findings over time.
>
>#2 The Board should develop metrics to
>measure the effectiveness of the Boards
>functioning and improvement efforts, and publish
>the materials used for training to gauge levels of improvement.
>
>#3 The Board should conduct
>qualitative/quantitative studies to determine
>how the qualifications of Board candidate pools
>change over time , and regularly assess
>Directors compensation levels against prevailing standards.
>
>#4 The Board should continue supporting
>cross-community engagement aimed at developing
>an understanding of the distinction between
>policy development and policy
>implementation. Develop complementary
>mechanisms whereby the Supporting Organizations
>and Advisory Committees (SO/AC) can consult with
>the Board on matters, including, but not limited
>to policy, implementation and administrative
>matters, on which the Board makes decisions.
>
>#5 The Board should review redaction
>standards for Board documents, Document
>Information Disclosure Policy (DIDP) and any
>other ICANN documents to create a single
>published redaction policy. Institute a process
>to regularly evaluate redacted material to
>determine if redactions are still required and
>if not, ensure that redactions are removed.
>
>#6 GAC-related recommendation
>
>#7 The Board should explore mechanisms to
>improve public comment through adjusted time
>allotments, forward planning regarding the
>number of consultations given anticipated growth
>in participation, and new tools that facilitate
>participation. The Board also should establish
>a process under the Public Comment Process where
>those who commented or replied during the Public
>Comment and/or Reply Comment period(s) can
>request changes to the synthesis reports in
>cases where they believe the Staff incorrectly summarized their comment(s).
>
>#8 To support public participation, the
>Board should review capacity of the language
>services department versus the Community need
>for the service using Key Performance Indicators
>(KPIs) and make relevant adjustments such as
>improving translation quality and timeliness and
>interpretation quality. ICANN should implement
>continuous improvement of translation and
>interpretation services including benchmarking
>of procedures used by international organizations such as the United Nations.
>
>#9 Consideration of decision-making inputs and appeals processes
>
>#10 The Board should improve the
>effectiveness of cross-community deliberations
>
>#11 Effectiveness of the Review Process
>
>#12 Financial Accountability and Transparency
>
>
>Larisa B. Gurnick
>Consultant/Senior Director, Organizational Reviews
>Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
><mailto:larisa.gurnick at icann.org>larisa.gurnick at icann.org
><tel:310%20383-8995>310 383-8995
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>
>atrt2 mailing list
>
><mailto:atrt2 at icann.org>atrt2 at icann.org
>
>https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/atrt2
>
>
>
>--
>
>Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhD
>
><http://www.gih.com/ocl.html>http://www.gih.com/ocl.html
>
>_______________________________________________
>atrt2 mailing list
><mailto:atrt2 at icann.org>atrt2 at icann.org
>https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/atrt2
>
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>
>atrt2 mailing list
>
><mailto:atrt2 at icann.org>atrt2 at icann.org
>
>https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/atrt2
>
>
>
>--
>
>Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhD
>
><http://www.gih.com/ocl.html>http://www.gih.com/ocl.html
>_______________________________________________
>atrt2 mailing list
>atrt2 at icann.org
>https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/atrt2
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/atrt2/attachments/20131219/b0d3a0d0/attachment.html>
More information about the atrt2
mailing list