avri at acm.org
Thu Dec 19 16:43:48 UTC 2013
Statement works for me.
On 19-Dec-13 11:28, Brian Cute wrote:
> I have been following the discussion on this point. Here is what I
> suggest and I am interested in feedback. ATRT2 adds a statement to the
> Report to this effect:
> "ATRT2 believes that these Recommendations are important and, to the
> extent accepted by the Board, should be treated as a strategic priority.
> To that end, ICANN should create an implementation plan and publish it
> to the Community."
> A few observations when considering this statement. It is appropriate,
> as ICANN continues to mature, that the organization treat Review Team
> recommendations that it accepts as strategic priority items. It is also
> appropriate to expect the organization to develop and implementation
> plan, publish it, execute and measure (with metrics, KPIs, benchmarks
> etc.) its implementation performance. Staff and Board have indicated
> that there are already some projects underway that map to
> Recommendations. That is a good thing. Mr. Zhang does raise a valid,
> practical point (supported by David Conrad). Are we asking ICANN to
> implement all of these Recommendations with the same level of
> prioritization and at the same time? This could be an impractical
> request. I would think that, in the normal course, if ICANN develops
> and implementation plan it will identify the effort and resources
> necessary to implement the Recommendations and that implementation of
> the Recommendations will vary to some degree.
> I think for all these reasons, the statement about may be useful to
> include in the Report.
> atrt2 mailing list
> atrt2 at icann.org
More information about the atrt2