demi at nic.br
Thu Dec 19 16:59:29 UTC 2013
On 12/19/2013 02:28 PM, Brian Cute wrote:
> "ATRT2 believes that these Recommendations are important and, to the
> extent accepted by the Board, should be treated as a strategic
> priority. To that end, ICANN should create an implementation plan and
> publish it to the Community."
Language ok for me.
> A few observations when considering this statement. It is
> appropriate, as ICANN continues to mature, that the organization treat
> Review Team recommendations that it accepts as strategic priority
> items. It is also appropriate to expect the organization to develop
> and implementation plan, publish it, execute and measure (with
> metrics, KPIs, benchmarks etc.) its implementation performance. Staff
> and Board have indicated that there are already some projects underway
> that map to Recommendations. That is a good thing. Mr. Zhang does
> raise a valid, practical point (supported by David Conrad). Are we
> asking ICANN to implement all of these Recommendations with the same
> level of prioritization and at the same time? This could be an
> impractical request. I would think that, in the normal course, if
> ICANN develops and implementation plan it will identify the effort and
> resources necessary to implement the Recommendations and that
> implementation of the Recommendations will vary to some degree.
> I think for all these reasons, the statement about may be useful to
> include in the Report.
> atrt2 mailing list
> atrt2 at icann.org
More information about the atrt2