[atrt2] ATRT2 Final Report - Draft#2 For Your Review
Avri Doria
avri at acm.org
Mon Dec 23 13:23:23 UTC 2013
Hi,
I tend to support Lise's point on this. Also I must admit I do not
understand what it has to do with attracting staff.
avri
On 23-Dec-13 04:40, Lise Fuhr wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
>
> The exact current text was agreed by the team at a conference call
> earlier this month. The last part of paragraph 12.3 is a result of
> comments from the last round of public comments.
>
> There are no preconceived agendas – and deviations go both ways. So I
> don’t think we go too far regarding intent.
>
> Furthermore I am not sure I understand your comment about benchmarking
> not being the only item to consider when trying to attract staff.
>
> I find that the paragraph is an important part of being accountable and
> ensuring that ICANN is accountable.
>
> Best,
>
> Lise
>
> *Fra:*Conroy, Stephen (Private) [mailto:Stephen.Conroy at aph.gov.au]
> *Sendt:* 23. december 2013 04:54
> *Til:* Larisa B. Gurnick
> *Cc:* Lise Fuhr; Brian Cute; Sabra Chartrand (Chartrand at att.net); ATRT2
> *Emne:* Re: [atrt2] ATRT2 Final Report - Draft#2 For Your Review
>
> Hi all
>
> Could I indicate I do not support Lise current paragraph 12.3
>
> It is far too restrictive in its intent
>
> Benchmarking is important but should not be the only item to consider
> when trying to attract staff
>
> The ATRT must not simply push preconceived agendas
>
> Stephen
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>
> On 23 Dec 2013, at 10:42 am, "Larisa B. Gurnick"
> <larisa.gurnick at icann.org <mailto:larisa.gurnick at icann.org>> wrote:
>
> Lise,
>
> Confirmed. The following wording is currently included in the
> report, in the Executive Summary as well as the body of the report.
>
> 12.3 Every three years the Board should conduct a benchmark study
> on relevant parameters, (e.g. size of organization, levels of staff
> compensation and benefits, cost of living adjustments, etc.)
> suitable for a non-profit organization. If the result of the
> benchmark is that ICANN as an organization is not in line with the
> standards of comparable organizations, the Board should consider
> aligning the deviation. In cases where the Board chooses not to
> align, this has to be reasoned in the Board decision and published
> to the Internet community.
>
> 12.4 In order to improve accountability and transparency ICANN’s
> Board should base the yearly budgets on a multi-annual strategic
> plan and corresponding financial framework [covering e.g. a
> three-year period] This rolling plan and framework should reflect
> the planned activities and the corresponding expenses in that
> multi-annual period. This should include specified budgets for the
> ACs and SOs. ICANN’s [yearly] financial reporting shall ensure that
> it is possible to track ICANN’s activities and the related expenses
> with particular focus on the implementation of the [yearly] budget.
> The financial report shall be subject to public consultation.
>
> Larisa
>
> *From:*Lise Fuhr [mailto:lise.fuhr at difo.dk]
> *Sent:* Sunday, December 22, 2013 11:03 AM
> *To:* 'Brian Cute'
> *Cc:* Larisa B. Gurnick; 'ATRT2'
> *Subject:* SV: [atrt2] ATRT2 Final Report - Draft#2 For Your Review
>
> Hi Brian,
>
> I would like to keep the previous edition of 12.4 and I hope that
> 12.3 still reads:
>
> 12.3 Every three years the Board should conduct a benchmark study
> on relevant parameters, (e.g. size of organization, levels of staff
> compensation and benefits, cost of living adjustments, etc.)
> suitable for a non-profit organization. If the result of the
> benchmark is that ICANN as an organization is not in line with the
> standards of comparable organizations, the Board should consider
> aligning the deviation. In cases where the Board chooses not to
> align, this has to be reasoned in the Board decision and published
> to the Internet community.
>
> Best regards and have a happy holiday,
> Lise
>
> *Fra:*Brian Cute [mailto:brianacute at gmail.com]
> *Sendt:* 22. december 2013 18:24
> *Til:* Lise Fuhr
> *Cc:* Larisa B. Gurnick; ATRT2
> *Emne:* Re: [atrt2] ATRT2 Final Report - Draft#2 For Your Review
>
> Lise,
>
> I have added footnotes with quotes from public comments to the
> report as well as a few edits. I intended those edits to add
> support to the recommendations. If you are uncomfortable with the
> impact on the recommendations you drafted, by all means fell free to
> change th to reflect the intent of your draft.
>
> Beat,
>
> Brian
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>
> On Dec 20, 2013, at 3:31 PM, "Lise Fuhr" <lise.fuhr at difo.dk
> <mailto:lise.fuhr at difo.dk>> wrote:
>
> Hi Larisa,
>
> I have a few remarks.
>
> I am not happy with the changes Sabra made on page 12 to
> recommendation 12.4. I think the new wording changes the
> recommendation too much. I furthermore don’t understand why the
> review team suddenly is a part of the recommendation. The
> changes are not in the same recommendation on page 81. I prefer
> the “original” version on page 81.
>
> At page 79 there is a comment from [s36] about “whose comments
> is this?”
>
> The section referred to is a part of the section above and is a
> part of the RySG comments to recommendation 12.4.
>
> I hope this is understandable.
>
> Have a nice weekend – and a Merry Christmas/holidays
>
> Best,
>
> Lise
>
> *Fra:*atrt2-bounces at icann.org <mailto:atrt2-bounces at icann.org>
> [mailto:atrt2-bounces at icann.org] *På vegne af *Larisa B. Gurnick
> *Sendt:* 20. december 2013 08:30
> *Til:* ATRT2 (atrt2 at icann.org <mailto:atrt2 at icann.org>)
> *Emne:* [atrt2] ATRT2 Final Report - Draft#2 For Your Review
>
> Dear Review Team members,
>
> Attached are documents comprising ATRT2 Final Report – Draft
> #2*. _Please review these documents and provide staff with your
> final edits by 23 UTC on Friday, 20 December_*_._
>
> Staff will circulate ATRT2 Final Report – Draft #3 on Monday 23
> December.
>
> Appendix B has not changed since the Draft Report. Appendix C
> reflects all the submitted changes. Appendix D is new.
>
> Staff made every effort to reflect your intended changes
> consistently and accurately, and the quality control effort is
> still continuing. However, due to the volume of changes, please
> take care to check your portions of the document to ensure
> accuracy. Formatting and table of contents will be updated in
> the next draft.
>
> As a reminder, ICANN will be closed for the holidays from noon
> on 24 December through 1 January, and the editor that has been
> engaged to assist with the Final Report will not be available
> after 23 December.
>
> Staff will be available to assist with any last minute edits
> upon return on 2 January. Staff will submit the final report
> for translation and coordinate the posting on the web site as
> soon as ATRT2 confirms the Final Report documents after the
> holidays.
>
> Best regards,
>
> */Larisa B. Gurnick/*
>
> Consultant/Senior Director, Organizational Reviews
>
> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
>
> larisa.gurnick at icann.org <mailto:larisa.gurnick at icann.org>
>
> 310 383-8995
>
> _______________________________________________
> atrt2 mailing list
> atrt2 at icann.org <mailto:atrt2 at icann.org>
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/atrt2
>
> _______________________________________________
> atrt2 mailing list
> atrt2 at icann.org <mailto:atrt2 at icann.org>
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/atrt2
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> atrt2 mailing list
> atrt2 at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/atrt2
>
More information about the atrt2
mailing list