[atrt2] Final review
Brian Cute
bcute at pir.org
Mon Dec 30 03:18:22 UTC 2013
Thanks Lise.
Best,
Brian
From: Lise Fuhr <lise.fuhr at difo.dk<mailto:lise.fuhr at difo.dk>>
Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2013 17:21:02 +0100
To: Brian Cute <bcute at pir.org<mailto:bcute at pir.org>>, "Larisa B. Gurnick" <larisa.gurnick at icann.org<mailto:larisa.gurnick at icann.org>>
Cc: <atrt2 at icann.org<mailto:atrt2 at icann.org>>
Subject: SV: Final review
Hi Brian,
I confirm that the attached version, which Larisa sent to ATRT2 December 24, includes the correct version of recommendation 12.
Best,
Lise
Fra: Brian Cute [mailto:bcute at pir.org]
Sendt: 29. december 2013 11:57
Til: Lise Fuhr
Cc: ATRT2
Emne: Final review
Lise,
I have completed final review, taking into account emails from the Recommendation editors to ensure accuracy and consistency. You offered some questions in an email to Larisa as follows: "I am not happy with the changes Sabra made on page 12 to recommendation 12.4. I think the new wording changes the recommendation too much. I furthermore don’t understand why the review team suddenly is a part of the recommendation. The changes are not in the same recommendation on page 81. I prefer the “original” version on page 81. At page 79 there is a comment from [s36] about “whose comments is this?” The section referred to is a part of the section above and is a part of the RySG comments to recommendation 12.4."
Would you kindly look at the latest version of the Report as sent to the ATRT2 by Larisa and confirm whether your issues have been resolved. If not, please direct me to the specific language that must be modified. Thank you.
Regards,
Brian
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/atrt2/attachments/20131230/899789b7/attachment.html>
More information about the atrt2
mailing list