[atrt2] small items on the recommendations in Draft #3 (Clean)

Brian Cute bcute at pir.org
Mon Dec 30 03:19:00 UTC 2013

Thanks Avri.


On 12/29/13 2:12 PM, "Avri Doria" <avri at acm.org> wrote:

>I don't think any of these are contentful, except maybe the last one,
>but probably not even that one.
>Am now going to try and read through the rest of it for one last time.
>page 2
>only an assessment of ICANN¹s implementation of those Recommendations only
>(double 'only')
>in 9.5 page 8
>don't need both the parenthetical with url and the footnote with the url.
>page 10
>it believes that it may establish gTLD policy7  in the event that the
>(in line footnote number in wrong font.)
>page 11
>12.4.  In order to improve accountability and transparency  ICANN¹s
>Board should base the yearly budgets on a multi-annual strategic plan
>and corresponding financial framework [covering e.g. a three-year
>period]. This rolling plan and framework should reflect the planned
>activities and the corresponding expenses in that multi-annual period.
>This should include specified budgets for the ACs and SOs. ICANN¹s
>[yearly] financial reporting shall ensure that it is possible to track
>ICANN¹s activities and the related expenses with particular focus on the
>implementation of the [yearly] budget. The financial report shall be
>subject to public consultation.
>(what does it mean that some text is in square brackets.  Is it using
>diplomatic  convention of listing controversial text that way. It is the
>only instance in the recommendations of [] so I don't understand their
>usage. Should they be parenthesis? )
>atrt2 mailing list
>atrt2 at icann.org

More information about the atrt2 mailing list