<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto"><div>Sorry, this should be for the whole group but I'm pretty jet-lAged right now</div><div><br></div><div>A nice Sunday to everybody<br><br>Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez<div><br></div><div>SUTEL, <span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-tap-highlight-color: rgba(26, 26, 26, 0.296875); -webkit-composition-fill-color: rgba(175, 192, 227, 0.230469); -webkit-composition-frame-color: rgba(77, 128, 180, 0.230469); ">Costa Rica</span></div><div><br></div><div>+506 4000 0010 Oficina</div><div>+506 8335 2487 Móvil </div><div>+506 2215 6821 Fax</div></div><div><br>Inicio del mensaje reenviado:<br><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div><b>De:</b> "Carlos Raúl G." <<a href="mailto:crg@isoc-cr.org">crg@isoc-cr.org</a>><br><b>Fecha:</b> 23 de febrero de 2013 23:16:38 GMT+01:00<br><b>Para:</b> Steve Crocker <<a href="mailto:steve@shinkuro.com">steve@shinkuro.com</a>><br><b>Asunto:</b> <b>Re: [atrt2] Egalitarian listing of ATRT2 members?</b><br><br></div></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><div><span>i don't have a problem either way, but prefer all in one team from (my point if view)</span><br><span></span><br><span>I'm still in the GAC until somebody tells me not to stay because ATRT2, but I checked with our ministry and at least they don't have anything against it. But I would take Heathers advice in any case</span><br><span></span><br><span>Costa Rica has an alternate rep to GAC (Santiago Nuñez) he will be taking most of the load there in Beijing and over the next few months</span><br><span></span><br><span>Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez</span><br><span></span><br><span>SUTEL, Costa Rica</span><br><span></span><br><span>+506 4000 0010 Oficina</span><br><span>+506 8335 2487 Móvil </span><br><span>+506 2215 6821 Fax</span><br><span></span><br><span>El 23/02/2013, a las 20:16, Steve Crocker <<a href="mailto:steve@shinkuro.com">steve@shinkuro.com</a>> escribió:</span><br><span></span><br><blockquote type="cite"><span>During the organization call Friday I was using a print out of the members. It had separate sections for the Volunteer Review Team members, the Independent Experts and the Ex-Officios. My preference is for all of the team members to be considered uniformly part of the same team, leaving behind the history of how we were selected. However, if the team prefers to retain the distinctions, it's certainly workable.</span><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><span>This is a small point, but since I found myself reacting internally and, to some extent, tripping over it while I chaired the call, I thought I'd mention it.</span><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><span>Preferences?</span><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><span>Thanks,</span><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><span>Steve</span><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><span>_______________________________________________</span><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><span>atrt2 mailing list</span><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><span><a href="mailto:atrt2@icann.org">atrt2@icann.org</a></span><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><span><a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/atrt2">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/atrt2</a></span><br></blockquote></div></blockquote></body></html>