<html>
<body>
Jørgen,<br><br>
Your original proposal was "whether in particular the views and
advice provided by GAC has been duly taken into account given the
specific tasks of national governments with respect to public
policy."<br><br>
There was a strong feeling from both Brian and Avri that we not call out
one particular stakeholder. Moreover, like other parts of my original
draft that were omitted, we need to be careful that the wording of the
RFP does not direct the outcome (that is, by us identifying the issue of
whether the GAC input is taken into account, we are to some extent
reaching a conclusion ahead of time - we wouldn't ask the question if
there were not a perceived problem).<br><br>
We already have the sub-bullet: "to what extent process incorporates
the views, advice and needs of all stakeholders, both those active in
ICANN and those not typically present for ICANN deliberations (See
Annex)."<br><br>
In Brian's absence, we (the three vice-chairs) feel that the best we can
do is to move the list of ICANN stakeholders from the Annex to the scope,
replacing that bullet with:<br><br>
"to what extent process incorporates the views, advice and needs
stakeholders, ICANN Advisory Committees - Governmental Advisory Committee
(GAC), At-large Advisory Committee (ALAC), Security and Stability
Advisory Committee (SSAC), Root Server System Advisory Committee (RSSAC);
Supporting Organizations - Generic Names Supporting Organization (GNSO),
Country Code Names Supporting Organization (ccNSO), Address Supporting
Organization (ASO); and those not typically present for ICANN
deliberations (See Annex)."<br><br>
And removing the footnotes in the Annex.<br><br>
I hope that you can accept this so that we can issue the RFP prior to
Brian's return.<br><br>
Alan (on behalf of Lise and Avri)<br><br>
<br>
At 28/06/2013 04:01 AM, Jørgen C Abild Andersen wrote:<br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">
<font face="Arial, Helvetica" size=2 color="#0000FF">Dear Alan
</font><br>
<br>
<font face="Arial, Helvetica" size=2 color="#0000FF">I am somewhat
surprised about your e-mail and I am not sure that I fully understand the
reasons for the proposed change of the approach we agreed at the
conference call last week. As you will recall the agreement we reached
also included adding a sentence as proposed by me. Upon your proposal it
was also agreed that the exact wording of the sentence should be agreed
between you and me bilaterally. I have not seen your proposal for fine
tuning of the wording yet but I will urge you to send your proposal for a
more precise wording of the sentence to me as soon as possible as I think
we all agree that it is very important to get the process started very
soon in accordance with what was agreed at our conference call last
week. <br>
</font> <br>
<font face="Arial, Helvetica" size=2 color="#0000FF">Best regards<br>
Jørgen<br>
</font><br>
<hr>
<font face="Tahoma" size=2><b>Fra:</b> atrt2-bounces@icann.org
[<a href="mailto:atrt2-bounces@icann.org" eudora="autourl">
mailto:atrt2-bounces@icann.org</a>] <b>På vegne af </b>Alan
Greenberg<br>
<b>Sendt:</b> 27. juni 2013 05:34<br>
<b>Til:</b> ATRT2<br>
<b>Emne:</b> [atrt2] URGENT: Final Draft RFP<br>
<b>Prioritet:</b> Høj<br>
</font><br>
Attached please find the hopefully final RFP. Before disappearing for the
next week, Brian made some edits, one of which removed the explicit
reference to the GAC under scope of work. Since he is not here to present
his rationale, I have temporarily left in his comment about why he felt
strongly that the particular reference should not be included in the
RFP.<br><br>
Partly in response to that, Lise and I, with Avri's agreement included an
explicit reference to ICANN ACs and SOs in the Annex description of
stakeholders.<br><br>
In addition to posting this RFP publicly, staff has identified two
potential consultants to explicitly be invited to bid, One World Trust
and Ken Bour. <b>With this note</b>, I ask staff to explain why they
believe that they could meet our needs.<br><br>
If anyone on the RT has additional suggestions for who to invite, please
let us know quickly. The list of those submitting proposals to the ATRT1
competition can be found at <br>
<a href="http://www.icann.org/en/about/aoc-review/atrt/rfp-respondents-evaluation-19jun10-en.pdf">
http://www.icann.org/en/about/aoc-review/atrt/rfp-respondents-evaluation-19jun10-en.pdf</a>
.<br><br>
If we are to meet the target issue date of July 1 (next Monday!), we need
to finalize everything quickly, so I ask for all comments and suggestions
to arrive no later that 12:00 UTC on Friday, June 28.<br><br>
If there are any <u>crucial</u> edits to them RFP itself, please submit
them as soon as possible to allow discussion.<br><br>
Alan<br><br>
<br><br>
<br><br>
</blockquote></body>
</html>