[ATRT3-implementation-shepherds] FW: Follow up from ATRT3 implementation shepherd call with the ATRT3 Board Caucus

[Vanda Scartezini]

Thanks Larisa. Very useful draft.
Kisses

Vanda Scartezini
Polo Consultores Associados
Av. Paulista 1159, cj 1004
01311-200- Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
Land Line: +55 11 3266.6253
Mobile: + 55 11 98181.1464
Sorry for any typos.





From: ATRT3-implementation-shepherds <atrt3-implementation-shepherds-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of "Larisa B. Gurnick" <larisa.gurnick at icann.org>
Date: Wednesday, September 30, 2020 at 19:36
To: ATRT3-implementation-shepherds <atrt3-implementation-shepherds at icann.org>
Cc: Leon Sanchez <leon.sanchez at board.icann.org>, Theresa SWINEHART <theresa.swinehart at icann.org>
Subject: [ATRT3-implementation-shepherds] FW: Follow up from ATRT3 implementation shepherd call with the ATRT3 Board Caucus

Hello all,
I hope that this note finds you all doing well.  Just following up on the note below.

In regards to the first item noted below, “Draft documentation of ATRT3 Handling of Public Comments & ATRT3 Member Concerns”, have you had a chance to confirm what our team has assembled on your behalf, and would you like us to submit it to the ATRT3 Board Caucus Group on your behalf?  The document is attached here for your convenience.

I know that you are still in the process of discussing the second item noted below – your input on the principles and the proposed effectiveness framework.  We appreciate your thoughtful consideration of this item and look forward to your input, when you are able to provide it.

Thank you,
Larisa

From: ATRT3-implementation-shepherds <atrt3-implementation-shepherds-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of "Larisa B. Gurnick" <larisa.gurnick at icann.org>
Date: Friday, September 18, 2020 at 6:04 AM
To: "atrt3-implementation-shepherds at icann.org" <atrt3-implementation-shepherds at icann.org>
Cc: Leon Sanchez <leon.sanchez at board.icann.org>, Theresa Swinehart <theresa.swinehart at icann.org>
Subject: [ATRT3-implementation-shepherds] Follow up from ATRT3 implementation shepherd call with the ATRT3 Board Caucus


Hello Adetola, Cheryl, Daniel, Pat, Sébastien and Vanda,

Thank you for your active and engaged participation and productive contributions toward the discussion on 8 September with the ATRT3 Board Caucus Group.  We would like to follow up on two items from this discussion.



DRAFT Documentation of ATRT3 Handling of Public Comments & ATRT3 Member Concerns

In response to several questions from the Board<https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/atrt3-implementation-shepherds/2020-September/000003.html>, at your suggestion, the ATRT3 support staff assembled the attached documentation “DRAFT Documentation of ATRT3 Handling of Public Comments & ATRT3 Member Concerns.”  This report provides a summary of points throughout ATRT3 face-to-face and virtual plenary meetings where public comments on the Draft ATRT3 report were referenced or discussed.  ICANN org assembled this information based upon the public record which can be found on the ATRT3 wiki<https://community.icann.org/display/atrt/ATRT3>. This information is not intended to be an analysis of ATRT3’s assessment of public comments or work.



Please review the attached documentation and confirm that it is what you had in mind to address some of the Board’s questions.  Please let us know if there are additional documents that you would like to share with the Board. After your confirmation and approval, we will forward the documentation to the ATRT3 Board Caucus Group.



Question for ATRT3 implementation shepherds’ consideration

During the 8 September call, we noted one question where you indicated that additional thought and consideration on your part would be needed.


·         Question 10: The Board developed a draft proposal,  “Resourcing and Prioritization of Community Recommendations: Draft Proposal for Community Discussion”  [icann.org]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/draft-proposal-resourcing-community-recommendations-29oct19-en.pdf__;!!PtGJab4!p11XIIz9RQtkY08fSzjrqaNKv9nkD1-qrMgmQAgCwvPS-Y1s1HB_GZEbmcQLEgEwTjQR78iY_g$>, in consultation with the ATRT3 leadership as well as the leadership of all other community-led reviews. It was published in October 2019. The draft proposal suggests principles for effective recommendations, along with a table that offers a proposed effectiveness framework for assessing the effectiveness of a given recommendation.  To what extent was the ATRT3 able to use this framework as guidance for developing recommendations? What aspects were useful and what aspects posed difficulties?  How would the ATRT3 implementation shepherds suggest adjusting the principles and the proposed effectiveness framework?



Once you have had a chance to think about the last portion of the above question, the Board Caucus would appreciate your input and views.



The recording from the 8 September call will soon be available on the Implementation shepherd wiki page<https://community.icann.org/display/atrt/ATRT3+Implementation+Shepherds>; in the meantime, you can listen to it here [drive.google.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/drive.google.com/file/d/1S3y7lC2zYg5kLKZgnLdSOnOXLMPFxZvB/view?usp=sharing__;!!PtGJab4!p11XIIz9RQtkY08fSzjrqaNKv9nkD1-qrMgmQAgCwvPS-Y1s1HB_GZEbmcQLEgEwTjQvg6RITA$>.



As the Board continues its consideration of the ATRT3 recommendations, there may be additional follow up questions or clarifications; we will continue to keep you informed of such developments.  Thank you again for your diligent work and help with this part of the ATRT3 review process.



Best wishes,

Larisa






-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/atrt3-implementation-shepherds/attachments/20201001/a3b6aa31/attachment-0001.html>